gre写作如何引用名人名言

怎样才能取得gre写作高分成绩?下面小编就和大家分享怎样才能取得gre写作高分成绩，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

怎样才能取得gre写作高分成绩

gre写作技巧一、观点最重要

新GRE作文与大部分英语写作能力的考察不同，GRE作文考察你的观点和逻辑思维能力，而大部分英语写作是考察语言能力。在GRE中，这样的思维能力分为Argument和Issue。在Argument中，要在两分钟内找出所有原文中潜在的逻辑漏洞以及推理问题。要对内容进行错误的寻找和反思。Issue中，有教育、行为学、传媒、政治等十一大类别，GRE考试的官方要求是要求考生能对这些话题提出深度的分析以及讨论，并且相应的给出自己的观点和看法，Issue最难的一点在于你必须给出合适的例子，这就要求大家在日常生活中多积累多准备了，例子最好是地道的、西方的了，避免使用一些太过中国化的例子。

gre写作技巧二、语言需要有保障

踏踏实实地提高英语运用能力吧，虽然GRE作文要求的语言难度相对较高，但不见得你就做不到了。第一，考生必须要用学术写作的方法，而不能出现口语化的表达。第二，整散结合，就是长短句交替出现，不至于显得空洞乏味。最后，避免单词的重复，多背一些近义词，同样的词可以用近义词来替换。语言的提高过程是漫长的，然而对于备考时间已经不足的同学来讲，现在再开始背单词恐怕已经本末倒置，到了最后准备一些模版吧，但这模版并不是让你到网上去下载下来背，而是仿写出属于自己的模版。

gre写作技巧三、逻辑结构很关键

由于学术写作的特殊性，文章逻辑严密是评分关键，种逻辑结构又分为段内逻辑结构和段落间逻辑结构。我建议全篇是以总分总的结构来书写，同时，段落中也采用总分总的结构，这样使得文章严密完整。也就是，先要有TOPIC SENTENCE，之后跟上SUPPORTING SENTENCE，而SUPPORTING SENTENCE又要用DEVELOPPING SENTENCE来对应支撑。另外，要学会灵巧正确地运用连接词，例如HOWEVER、SO、BECAUSE等等，你文章中的连接词是会直接影响到你整体写作评分的，请各位要谨记。

gre写作技巧四、练习中寻找写作灵感

对于GRE写作来说，日常的练习是必不可少的，只有不断的勤加练习，才能将平时积累的精美语句以及词汇运用到实践当中，通过长而久之的练习，在GRE考试中才能将这些灵活的运用，同时平时的练习还可以提高自己的写作灵感，可以迅速的从考试题目中提取写作主旨，才能保证自己的写作不会跑题，因此写作水平的提高不是一蹴而就的，而是一个从量变到质变的过程。

gre写作技巧五、养成好的心态

广大考生应该利用好水平测试，把水平测试当成真正的GRE考试，不仅可以检验自己的之前的复习成果，还可以查漏补缺，最重要的是在水平测试中调整好自己的心态，以平常心去应对，好的心态也是决定考试成绩关键的因素。

gre写作怎么练呢?

具体方法是，阅读一定量的题目。这样的好处有二：

一、通过阅读题目，只找错误来训练。

二、没有谁能保证argument里面不会出现一个你不认识的单词，万一是个关键词，那可就……

argument其实和issue也是想通的，锻炼一者的同时另一者一定也会提高，所以不要纠结浪费时间的问题。

GRE写作高分范文：权威问题

Much of the information that people assume is‘factual’actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.

大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不准确的。因此，任何据称是事实的信息都应该被质疑，因为它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误的。

GRE写作范文：

Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.

To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.

However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of

cognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.

Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.

GRE写作高分范文：过度专业化问题

GRE写作题目：

“Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that scholars' ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider audience，their ideas will have little use.”

近些年来，学科已经细化到了相当的程度以至于学者们的理念只影响小范围的人群。除非学者们能拥有影响等大范围的人群，否则他们的理念将几乎毫无用处。

GRE写作范文：

Although academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years，scholars' ideas can still reach a wide audience by the advantage of the knowledge structure. We can simply put that it is the human beings' knowledge structure that makes it possible for a scholar's ideas in his specialized discipline to reach a much wider audiences who don't necessarily belong to his own discipline.

The reason why I draw this conclusion will be illustrated by recalling the process of social evolution.

During the passed centuries，the social economy has been greatly boosted by the revolutions in science and technology，which in turn increases the width and depth of academic disciplines to solve unencountered and more complex problems arising in the new situations. To solve new problems，we probably need new methods. That will undoubtedly calls for invention of new ideas，which will certainly adds to human beings' knowledge. Thus with the progress of science and technology，more and more knowledge will be added to the old system. A new problem will come： how the newly obtained knowledge is organized. This problem will be clear when we make classification of the new knowledge according to the old knowledge system. If there is content of the newly-get that doesn't properly belong to any sort of the old system，it means a

new discipline will emerge. But could we just assert that the newly formed discipline doesn't possess any relationship with any of the old ones? Certainly not. This is because the new knowledge is obtained through the old methods，which obviously means the new knowledge do have some connections with some old disciplines，otherwise I am quite sure we could not find it!

From the above，we can easily reach the conclusion that every academic discipline has certain relationships with some other ones. The structure of human's knowledge is just like the complexity of a net! And also it is a natural trend that academic disciplines become more and more specialized.

With the depositing and specializing process of knowledge，it causes humans to accommodate themselves to this situation. Because the God gives every person a limited time and energy，it is necessary for a person，who wants to make progress in his discipline，to adjust his knowledge structure to adapt to his research domain，that is to say，to be more devoted to his own research area. On the other hand，if he cares too much for unrelated or less related area，he will probably not be able to bring innovation to his main academic discipline. Simply put，we almost cannot find a man who constructs the Theory of Relativity and in the mean time composes symphony like Mozart's! So we can say every scholar must be more devoted to his own discipline than to others，but a wider knowledge of other disciplines sometimes involuntarily invokes sparks of new ideas.