怎样才能取得gre写作高分成绩

如何准备gre写作?其实，答案很简单，只需要四个步骤就够了!下面小编就和大家分享准备gre写作考试据说只需要四步，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

准备gre写作考试据说只需要四步

gre考试写作备考步骤1：观点的培养。

阅卷官是会去看每段的开头看你这段在讲什么，所以建议大家最好把主旨句放在开头，段落小主旨放在段首，当然转折和结尾的地方也是很好的位置。然后观点鲜明，千万不要打太极，一定要开门见山，明确地提出自己的观点，亮出自己的立场，最好不要中庸，英文文章喜欢在段首开头就把观点提出，后面都是支持论证。毕竟总之就是要明晃晃的地提出自己的观点，让考官能够一目了然地找到他最想看的内容。

gre写作备考步骤2：内容的选择。

很多考生喜欢用复杂生僻的词堆砌文章，以为这样会展现自己的实力，其实简单明了地表达句子，彻底展现出中心思想和提供强有力的论证才是写作的重点，高大上的词偶尔可以用，但不能通篇都是。但是谨记避免作文切记假大空，一定要把表达的东西具体化，如我们的头脑会对flora，tree和willow产生完全不同的反应，willow是最为生动的，马上在我们头脑中形成具体的画面，这就是为什么我们的写作细节里面一定要有具体的事例。所以大家在备考时要训练选词和准备具体事例。

gre备考步骤3：多练习写模板。

如果在备考期间只是想想作文的框架，而不去真正写出文章，在考试的时候会发现，根本写不出具体细节或者是时间根本不够用。　　大家在备考时一定要下笔写，大家不妨找一个gre备考资料类的作文题目，看看自己能不能立即写出文章，如果做不到的话，那么你的写作备考和实际能力已经出现了严重脱节，还是赶紧行动起来，执行比构思要难。

gre备考步骤4：储备素材。

要知道gre考试时间非常紧张，作文部分只有30分钟。所以备考时要熟悉一些句型和事例素材，考试时才能信手拈来。因此考生根本没有时间和良好的心态在那里慢慢思考，所以就是看大家平时的写作功夫了。一分耕耘一分收获，积累的句型和素材能够在这个时候帮助你节省下大量思考时间。

GRE作文范文：多媒体教育

Although innovations such as video，computers，and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students，these technologies all too often distract from real learning.

GRE作文范文参考：

Nowadays there is a growing concern about the role that innovations have played in the field of learning. While most people think that innovations benefit learning process in various ways，different opinions arise that these technology advancements actually distract students from real learning. On balance，according to my personal observation，whether innovations can be beneficial or detrimental to real learning depends on the students and the teachers，not on these innovations themselves.

To begin with，technological innovations do help teaching and learning in various ways.With the aid of these technologies，the process of teaching and learning can be shorter and easier than before. For instance，if a student want certain published papers of an academic discipline，he/she may look through considerable catalogs to find the ones he/she needs. However，with the help of Internet innovation，at present most of these papers are published online. Consequently，to find certain paper the procedure is much easier and shorter， the students just type the key words and other information of the paper，and then the system will search the database，and the papers are there waiting for them. As this new approach can save a lot of time for the students，he/she could have more time reading the papers and absorbing the knowledge rather than checking and looking for the papers that could be a waste of his/her time. This example aptly illustrates how technology advancement benefited the students and their learning process.

Secondly，while innovations can help learning in various ways，it is more important that the central role of the pursuit for knowledge and wisdoms are maintained. What real matters is not the approach but the purpose of learning. In India，where modern technologies are less applied to the learning process than in the US and other developed countries，still a lot of distinguished students achieved their academic goal with their hard work and desires to knowledge. In the US，where the software engineering students are given the most advanced facilities and apparatus for their learning and research，however，it is wildly accepted that they are far less outstanding compared to the Indian students of software，who may share computers in groups. From this comparison we can see that the real and core push of learning is the desire for knowledge，not the help of innovations.

In addition，if not guided properly，the technology advancement might inhibit learning.In other words，innovation can distract the students from real learning than helping them. It is obvious that a computer can help students of science to calculate mathematical equations but can also be used for recreation such as net surfing or computer games. It is highly possible that these students can spend more time and energy on recreations rather than learning when using a computer. Thus，learning is inhibited. Under this circumstance，guidance and restrictions are needed to ensure the right use of innovations for learning，or the consequence may be on the contrary to the students and teachers' desire.

To conclude，technological innovations are beneficial to learning in many ways，but when using these technologies，one should not forget the real purpose of learning and remember not to be distracted for other usages of these innovations that are irrelevant or detrimental to learning. On balance，innovation here serves as a double-edges sword，and its right use is dependent on the students and the teachers.

GRE作文范文：事物不会一成不变

Much of the information that people assume is‘factual’actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.

GRE作文范文参考：

Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.

To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.

However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.

Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.

To sum up，while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately，for the reason of the limitation of the abilities，I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves，as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis，I would arguer once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable，we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.