雅思写作破6分语法不犯错是关键

雅思写作考试注意事项之4个不要要牢记一文总结了4个在雅思写作考试中千万不要犯规的注意事项。下面小编就和大家分享雅思写作考试注意事项之4个不要要牢记，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

雅思写作考试注意事项之4个不要要牢记

第一点要牢记的是，千万不要字体潦草，难以辨认。很多考生认为字体不重要，平时写字就龙飞凤舞，到了考场时间紧张，字体更加潦草，难以辨认，给考官阅卷带来困难。字体不好会不会影响分数? 笔者曾经专门请教过雅思考官，得到的答案是，字体当然会影响分数!想想看，考官是通过阅读你写的文字来了解你的观点和思路，判定你的写作水平，而每篇文章通常只有2—3分钟的阅卷时间，如果字体潦草，难以辨认，影响了考官的阅读和理解，势必会影响分数，所以亲爱的考生们，一定要字迹工整清晰啊!

第二点要牢记的是，千万不要单边论证，结构失衡。在雅思大作文题目中，通常都有两个对立面需要去分别阐述和论证，如果你只说其一，不说其二，片面看待问题，很容易造成写作偏题，结构失衡，因此而失分。比如下面这个题目：

Some people think money which the government spends on art, such as music and painting, would be better spent on things more important. Do you agree or disagree?

该题话题属于政府支出类，题目中有两个对立面，分别是art和things more important，都需要阐述。而有的同学只写things more important，比如教育和医疗，忽略其对立面art，那么这样的文章就是偏题，没有完全回应题目的要求，会因此而失分。考生在审题的时候，一定要把握住题目中的对立面，正方和反方都要有相应的主体段落。

第三点要牢记的是，千万不要语法错误太多、用词不当。6分的作文，是一篇可读性较强的文章，可以是简单句为主，复合句为辅，语法错误很少，读起来通顺流畅。很多考生误以为“牛”的文章就是大词长词、从句套从句，因此他们过于追求生僻的词汇和复杂的句型，经常出现用词错误和语法错误。殊不知这样错误百出的文章，在考官眼里只是“小学生作文”，很难上6分。因此，雅思中文官网老师建议考生尽量选择有把握的常用词汇，力求写出符合英语语法的准确句子，多写多练，提高表达的准确性，这样就离6分越来越近了。

第四点要牢记的是，千万不要逻辑混乱，思维跳跃。有的考生在论证观点时不符合常理和逻辑，比如在论证因果关系时，不是从原因到结果一步一步往下推进，而是想到哪说到哪，思维跳跃，缺乏逻辑。这样的文章，考官读起来可能感到不知所云。其实在论证时，并不需要高深莫测的思想和标新立异的观点，只要把论点合理展开，解释清楚，符合常理和逻辑就可以了。

以上就是雅思写作考试注意事项之4个不要要牢记的全部内容，同学们都记住了吗。上文总结的4点都是雅思写作在评分标准当中的重要得分点，特别是第二点至第四点的内容。雅思写作不管是大作文还是小作文，都是典型的英文立论文的写作问题，比起词语的华丽性，在这之前更加追求能不能通过文章把一个事情和观点说清楚。

雅思写作Task2社会类考官范文

Write about the following topic:

More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.

Do you agree or disagree?

Model Answer:

The so-called ‘brain drain’ from poor to rich countries is now robbing poorer countries of essential personnel like doctors, nurses, engineers, and the trend is set to continue, if not to get worse.

Some people say this movement of people around the world is not a new phenomenon. Migrant workers have always been attracted by the wider choice of employment and greater opportunity in major cities in their own countries and abroad. Recently, as the technological age has advanced and as richer countries find themselves with not enough workers to feed their development, they have had to run to other parts of the world to find the necessary manpower. Many richer European countries, for example, are now trying to attract skilled IT workers from my home country India by offering higher salaries than they could hope to earn at home. With the globalisation of the world economy, many people feel that the process cannot be stopped.

Others, myself included, are of the opinion that measures should be taken to address the problem, by compensating poorer countries financially for the loss of investment in the people they have trained, like doctors and nurses. Admittedly, this may be cumbersome to administer, but an attempt could be made to get it off the ground. Another step, which in part has already begun to happen, is to use the forces of globalization itself. Western countries could encourage people to stay in their own countries by direct investment in projects like computer factories or by sending patients abroad for treatment, as is already happening.

It is obviously difficult to restrict the movement of people around the world and it is probably foolish to try to stop it, but attempts should be made to redress the imbalance.

雅思写作Task2社会类考官范文

Write about the following topic:

In most countries multinational companies and their products are becoming more and more important. This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life.

Do you agree or disagree?

Model Answer:

Multinational companies nowadays find it convenient both to market their goods all over the world and set up production facilities wherever they find it convenient. In my opinion this has had an adverse effect on our quality of life in three main areas.

The first area is their products. Supporters of globalization would argue that multinational companies make high-quality goods available to more people. While this may be true to some extent, it also means that we have less choice of products to consume. When powerful multinational companies invade local markets with their goods, they often are obliged local companies with fewer resources to go out of business. In consequence, we are obliged to buy multinational products whether we like them or not.

This brings me to my second point. It is sometimes said that multinational companies and globalisation are making societies more open. This may be true. However, I would point out that as a result the human race is losing its cultural diversity. If we consumed varied products, societieswherever we live would be more varied. This can be seen by the fact that we all shop in identicalmultinational supermarkets and buy identical products wherever we live.

Thirdly, defenders of multinational companies often point out that they provide jobs. Although this is undoubtedly true, it also means that we have become more valnurable on them, which in turn makes us more vulnerable to their decisions. When, for example, a multinational decides to move its production facilities to another country, this has an adverse effect on its workers who lose their jobs.

All in all, I believe that if we as voters pressured our governments to make multinational companies more responsible and to protect local producers from outside competition, we could have the benefits of globalisation without its disadvantages.