GRE写作减少拼写扣分要这么练

GRE写作中，ISSUE作为论证观点的立论文，对举例素材的需求量是很大的。考生为了应对可能出现的各种题目，常会提前准备许多案例素材以备考试之用。今天小编给大家带来了GRE写作论述举例如何更有说服力 ,希望能够帮助到大家，一起来学习吧。

GRE写作论述举例如何更有说服力

GRE写作例子要好写好记

关于GRE写作例子的选择和准备，首先大家要注意的是例子必须好写好记。这一点其实很好理解，GRE考试官方公布的作文题库总计400多道题目，考生为了应对可能出现的题目势必要记住足够数量的例子素材。而如果例子素材本身比较复杂，包含了一些很难记住的人名等特殊词汇，那么对于考生来说记忆压力都会变得很大。因此，GRE写作例子素材选择的第一个要求就是本身必须好写好记。很多同学在准备素材时忽略了这个问题，导致没能很好地记住案例，写出来的时候出现各种细节错误，这对于作文得分显然是很不利的。

GRE写作例子不能一味追求高大上

这个问题其实在考生当中也普遍存在，几乎可以说是“通病”了。一说到艺术就是梵高莫扎特，一提起法律问题总是会举例辛普森案。这些例子看似名气响知名度高，其实但从论证效果角度来看，并不比大家给出的其它没那么“高大上”的例子更好。比如法律问题，如今的网络安全、环境保护、食品问题等等相关的例子都完全可以拿出来用，而艺术类可以具体用的例子就更多了。大家完全没有必要只追求那些著名事例。另外，但凡是这些著名案例，可以想见使用它们的GRE考生会有多少，而这些被过度使用的例子想必也不会太受考官们的待见。与其随大流使用它们，还不如用一些同样有足够说服力还能让考官们眼前一亮的事例，也许反而会得到更高的评价。

GRE写作例子切忌胡编乱造

关于准备GRE素材案例，考生还比较容易犯的一个错误就是胡编乱造。可能以前大家写中文议论文时有时候会自己编造一些所谓的“名人名言”，比如某某曾说过这样的例子。但在GRE写作中，这种自己编造例子的做法还请尽量避免为好。虽然考官在看到陌生的例子时不一定真的回去查证，但编造例子的做法其实还是属于学术造假的，一旦被发现问题后果可能会很严重。所以小编建议大家不要尝试这种做法。

避免使用学术性专业性强的例子

最后这一点大家可能很少会意识到，那就是GRE写作终究还是立论文，是写给大众看，用来说服大多数人的。这一点从GRE作文题目本身也可以看出，其中并没有非常学术性专业性的资料。因此，考生在使用论证素材时，也应该学会少用学术性专业性强的例子。换句话说，只有具有典型性和普遍性的例子，才会更具有说服力。为了证明一个简单的观点，使用一些非常学术大部分人都不了解的例子，这种做法对于提升论述说服力只会适得其反。

综上所述，GRE写作ISSUE中如何选择和准备合适的例子，这其中还有很多要点需要大家学习。本文中给出的这些勘误建议，希望大家能够参考学习，为GRE写作提分做好更全面的准备。

GRE写作高分范文：现代摄像机和印刷术

GRE写作题目：

“The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records.”

摄像机可以通过如此精确而有力的记录手段来再现当代生活，因此它已经代替书面记录成为了一种更重要的记录手段。

GRE写作范文：

“The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records.”There have been many methods of documenting in the history of human， from carved ancient pottery to sheepskin documents， of which the video camera may be the newest form with certain superiorities and inferiorities to written records. The advantages of video camera certainly make it an important form of documentation， but not to the extent of being more essential than written records due to its disadvantages.

To begin with， video can be interpreted as a series of pictures associated along the time， while written records can be considered as the descriptions of these pictures.Therefore， it is undoubtedly that video contains much more information than that of written records. From a video， we can clearly know what happened with subtle details.Merely with a television set， we can easily watch the happenings at home， such as the Olympic Games， comfortably sitting on the sofa， needless to be present on the spot.

And more excitedly， certain close-up enables us to scrutinize our favorable athletes. If there isn‘t video camera， we may be unable to enjoy such activities unless we can afford time and expense to be on the spot. While it is true that we can also be acquainted with the circumstances through newspaper or other media， however， the written record may be unable to present them as accurate as video. The imagination from the reports， however detailed， dooms to be imaginary， by all means different from the real circumstance， which video can represent. Moreover， the written records may contain some mistakes due to the carelessness or injustice of its reporters， while the video may be more accurate and convincing.

Another strongpoint of video is that it can be perceived simply by visual signals， from which people mainly get information in their daily lives， and therefore this method is more natural than written records. Everyone， ranging from a babbling child to an old grandpa， is able to get some information from the video just as they do during their daily lives， regardless of their literate ability. While the written record， no matter how easily it is represented， requires literacy of its readers， and a newspaper or book means nothing to an illiterate person. In addition， video is much easier to comprehend for people all over the world. For instance， an American can grasp nothing about a story written in Chinese unless s/he has learnt such a foreign language. However， s/he can absolutely understand something about a video recorded in China， although s/he may be confused with the language spoken in the video.

While video is certainly not superior to written recorders in all aspects， its limitations determine that the written record will not be replaced at least at present. The first disadvantage of video is that it is much more inconvenient and expensive. Video must be recorded on the spot， namely， when an event happens to you， you cannot record it unless you have a camera at hand. However， even though you haven’t paper and pencil either， you are still able to recall it to record based on your remembrance.

Therefore， for those who can’t afford a handy camera or who are unwilling to bring it anytime anywhere， the written records may be the easiest form available. Further， another weakness of video is that its cost is too high and its correspondingly high-quality record may be beyond people‘s requirement. The cost of making a written report is much less than that of manipulating a video. Also， every morning we may browse a newspaper to know what happened throughout the world， and the simple report， which may only consume us a few seconds， meets our needs of curiosity; we needn’t the accuracy and vividness of video， which may be more time-consuming.

GRE写作高分范文：思想家

GRE写作题目：

Most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously，even when they claim to admire them.

大多数社会都没把最伟大的思想家当回事，虽然有时候这些社会自称是求才若渴的。

GRE写作范文：

In this busy，packed and dull world，people's most important concerning is how to make a living. They work assiduously to make money，to support their family，to purchase houses and cars. Hardly one common individual knows who their greatest thinkers are，not mention to take them seriously. Admittedly，in some cases，people claim that they admire the greatest thinkers; however，they actually know little about what the greatest thinkers' thoughts are. The fact is，in history of human civilizations，most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously，even when the greatest thinkers are seemed to be respected.

Generally，whatever societies the greatest thinkers are in，they have similar characteristics，such as high intelligence，eccentric temperament，wide range of knowledge，and the most essential one： the deeply and often predicted thoughts，which is the product of real wisdom. On one hand，it is the thoughts that distinguish the greatest thinkers from the mass. On the other hand，it is also the thoughts，however correct and predicted，which cause these elites out of the mass' sights and put them into an embarrassment in which few can understand them and their thoughts. A proper example is the passional German philosopher and poet Nietzche. Nietzche is a pioneer，whose profound exploration in philosophy influenced the descendants deeply. Yet his life is miserable and full of tragedies. Without money and job，Nietzche lived an impoverished life， which along with loneliness defeated him at last： he became insane when 45，and died 10 years later. Until that time，almost no one knew him or his thoughts. Even today，many people including some scholars call him mad philosopher.

In some worse cases，the greatest thinkers are even persecuted by their societies since the greatest thinkers always tend to have skeptical and critical thoughts，which the manipulators fear mostly and manipulated reluctant to accept. The reason is that once the advanced ideas，which are against the old ones，are accepted by mass，the domination or the present social system will in the danger of collapse. And at the same times，most people are reluctant to admit that what they believe in or cherish，however，always prejudice and rigid ideas set in people's minds beforehand，are not the truth but falsehood or illusions. A case in point is the great astronomer Copernicus，who developed the theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun. Although the theory was the most advanced astronomy theory in that time，it hadn't come out of press until the year before Copernicus' death because of mass being strongly against it especially the powerful churches，which were afraid that such a theory would shake authority of theology.