GRE作文机经高效率提分用法

GRE写作中国考生的平均成绩只有3分。而扣分中，拼写错误往往就会导致0.5-1分的扣分。今天小编给大家带来了GRE写作减少拼写扣分要这么练 ,希望能够帮助到大家，一起来学习吧。

GRE写作减少拼写扣分要这么练

GRE写作拼写错误也会扣分?

在GRE写作中，出现拼写错误会导致扣分，但具体评分标准可能许多同学都不清楚。实际上，根据ETS曾经发布过的作文评分标准，考生如果在写作中出现较多的拼写错误，可能会导致0.5-1分的扣分。也就是说，在满分六分的作文中，考生的拼写错误往往就会带走6分之1的分数，代价还是相当高昂的。很多人因为拼写扣分，导致自己作文从优秀的4分掉到平均分3分，可谓损失惨重。

GRE写作拼错出错原因对策分析讲解

那么，是什么原因导致了GRE写作中不少同学频频出现拼写错误呢?小编认为主要有以下几点原因：

1. 自身缺乏对拼写扣分的认识

考生在面对写作时，往往首先会想到的都是诸如文章框架结构、逻辑思路推理论证、素材论据使用以及好词妙句的语言组织和准确运用这些看似高大上的内容。这实际上并没有任何问题，毕竟这些要素才是构成一篇GRE高分作文的主要组成部分。然而有些考生过于看重这些内容，因此对拼写就采取了忽视甚至无视的态度，觉得只要在规定时间内写出好文章即可，一两个拼写错误就不用太过在意了。实际上这种想法是有失偏颇的，因为单从分值上来说拼写问题和上面提到的任何一点都完全相同。大家花的心思比重差距巨大，最后分值却一样，而实际上许多拼写错误只要考生稍加留意就可以完全避免。因此，考生在心态上必须重视拼写错误。

对策分享

既然知道了拼写问题的重要性，那么考生在之后的写作中，就需要更进一步纠正这类问题加以重视，其实大家在这方面需要投入的时间和精力都很少，每次写完作文预留出一定时间返回检查一下，在写作过程中多加注意即可，写作中的拼写可以说是投入产出比最高的部分了。稍微留点神就能轻松拿到分数。

2. 不清楚拼写出问题到底会扣多少分

这个问题其实很多人都存在，就是缺乏对于写作评分和扣分标准的基本认识。如同上文所言，拼写所占分值在0.5-1分之间，对于6分作文来说并不算少。但由于许多考生在复习前并没有具体了解过评分标准，或者只是了解了一个大概，因此对于这点并不太清楚。至于要出现多少拼写错误才会被扣分，或者说容错率有多少，虽然ETS并没有公布具体数据，但根据小编总结印象，一般来说只要是不影响阅读的关键性词汇出错，那么容错率大致在5个左右。如果不到这个数值，考生往往并不会被扣掉分数，但如果一路下来到处是TYPO，那么被扣分也是在所难免的。

对策分享

小编建议大家拿出复习用的官方指南OG，再把写作部分的评分标准仔细研究一下。同时对于不同评分的作文，也进行一些适当对比，看看拼写错误到底会造成如何的扣分。同时在平时练习中也要加强对拼写问题的重视程度，尽可能确保这部分的成绩不要损失。

3. 手脑不协调打字TYPO现象严重

GRE写作是机考，因此考生写文章全靠键盘打字，这对于一些习惯了手写的考生来说可能就不太适应，打字基本功不到家没练好，打字速度偏慢等等问题一直困扰着部分考生，而其中因为打字不熟练所导致的TYPO错误也是一大问题。明明写作很有思路，却因为不熟悉键盘手指反应跟不上，最后往往就会出现拼写错误。

对策分享

打字问题直接对写作造成影响，拼写出错、写作速度太慢等等都是需要尽快解决的问题。小编建议大家在平时练习写作的时候就开始使用电脑来进行操作，假如自己打字技能不熟练，那么请务必做好事先练习，毕竟这是基本功，不仅是眼前的GRE考试，以后留学生活中也是必备的基础技能。

GRE写作高分范文：忠诚

GRE写作题目：

Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue. But loyalty-whether to one's friends，to one's school or place of employment，or to any institution-is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force.

大多数人被告知忠诚是一种美德。但是无论是对朋友、对学校、对单位还是对任何机构，忠诚时常都是弊大于利的。

GRE写作范文：

I disagree with the author for he has confused the faithfulness with the misguided or overextended loyalty. In fact，loyalty does be a cherished virtue that should be given enough emphasis.

Loyalty，a kind of lasting persistence and its precondition is that the subject of fidelity is worthy of such strong emotion. In each society，loyalty is a indispensable and vital part of the system of morality. No matter in schools，at home or at work，first midst and last，people accept a similar education that as an individual，he or she should first have a sense of ligeance，that is work for the whole. Of course，the subjects of loyalty are various including scientific theory，friends，family，schools，places of employment and the nation. A vivid example can lend support to the statement is the heroical astronomer - Bronow，who advanced Copernicus' theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun，enraged the Roma church that held the Ptolemaic system of astronomy and was burnt to death just because he refused to give up his scientific theory. It is the lasting loyalty toward truth that lead Bronow to sacrifice himself. And people all respect such duteous spirit. However，without loyalty，the morality of a society will deteriorate into apathy desert and everyone just lives for him/herself，that is to say，no one is willing to pay loyalty to the whole，then finally the human civilization will fall apart.

However，on the other hand，the fidelity should not be confused with misguided or overextended loyalty and the latter is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force. People all hold that mutual loyalty between friends is the basis of lasting friendship. But people should also realize that true loyalty and authentic responsibility for a friend are not only always believing him or her unconditionally but also persuading，helping and even impeaching him or her when him or her has committed serious mistakes or even crimes. Of course，when facing up to such painful dilemma，each one will hesitate because he or she is afraid of being censured to betray his or her friend and some one may choose to keep slient in order to insist of the so-called loyalty.

In fact，such behavior may prevent his or her friend from taking right actions. The same to a school，a family，a company even the nation，when the subject that people once string along with no longer deserves loyalty，people should resolutely choose to be loyal to the truth，the justice and the humanity. That calls for people are always alert to what they think right and what they think wrong，via doing so，people can change their mind for right choice on time

To sum up，people should insist on true loyalty，and always avoid being the victim of the misguided or overextended loyalty. In the world，there is nothing that can be always absolutely right or wrong and changing happens all the time. So people should always hold deep insight to discern what deserves their loyalty and what does not

GRE写作高分范文：生动剖析写作

GRE写作题目：

Too much time, money, and energy are spent developing new and more elaborate technology. Society should instead focus on maximizing the use of existing technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens.

GRE写作范文：

I must say that I reject this statement. While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, that does not in any way mean that we should stop progressing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it. Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so. To do so would be tantamount to adopting a fatalistic approach; I think most people would reject that.

Technology has helped, and it has hurt. Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.

Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?

What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.

Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hosptal, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existing technology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have made those discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.

GRE写作分析：

字数：651

语言：平实的语句完全没有网络流行模板的痕迹，也是许多过了6级的考生通过练习可以达到的水平。

I must say that I reject this statement.

Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so.

Technology has helped, and it has hurt.

Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.