GRE写作论述举例如何更有说服力

GRE写作对逻辑思路极为看重，大家的复习重点也往往集中在论述的逻辑合理性和思路方面，而对于词汇语法却甚少关心。今天小编给大家带来了GRE写作提升词汇语法也是重要步骤 ,希望能够帮助到大家，一起来学习吧。

GRE写作提升词汇语法也是重要步骤

GRE写作词汇量足够才能丰富具体内容

首先小编要说的是GRE写作词汇，写作词汇并不是那些看过脸熟记住意思就行的词汇，而是需要通过实际使用掌握了正确用法的词汇。GRE对于词汇在不同题型中有着不同的要求。数学词汇只要能知道各个专用名词的含义，能够读懂题目就算过关。而语文部分则要求考生具备一定的辨析能力，即深度理解。至于作文词汇的要求则是最高的，也就是正确而合理的使用。

除了学会使用以外，考生对于GRE写作词汇，还需要学会替换。词汇量不足最直接的表现之一就是一个词汇的反复使用，特别是一些形容词。用来用去都是同一个词很容易让人觉得厌烦。因此，对于常用词汇多准备一些可以替换的词就显得很重要了，因为这样做可以使得使得文章语言多样化。而准备替换词，平日积累是必不可少的。积累的最好方法就是阅读。而且要注意避免用词过于简单和通俗，尤其要避免口头语和俚语的使用，相应地增加正式用语，尤其是在逻辑论证中，可以适当使用较为学术的词汇。

GRE作文语法不过关也会处处出错扣分

GRE写作中的语法问题同样是困扰许多考生的一大难题。大量使用简单句显然不行，但一些复杂的结构自己又没有把握写对写好，那么语法应该如何提升呢?大家不妨从GRE考试的其他题型中进行借鉴。比如GRE语文部分的填空和等价题就可以帮助考生学会实用、简洁、能够清楚地表达自己的意思的词汇和短语用法。而GRE阅读也可以让大家从中学习一些长难句，并学习作者立论和证明论点的过程，学习其中的过渡段落等等。当然，GRE写作考试的备考复习中，考生在充分利用阅读、逻辑、填空题目进行英语思维转换之后，还要多阅读一些范文，学习别人行文的方法，使之转化成自己的资源，并且多加练习，久而久之写作就不是一件难事了。

总而言之，想要写出GRE高分作文，打好词汇和语法的基础是必不可少的。只有练好了这两门写作必备的重要基本功，考生才能游刃有余地表达出自己的想法和观点，写好作文。

GRE写作高分范文：information

GRE写作题目：

Much of the information that people assume is factualactually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.

大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不准确的。因此，任何据称是事实的信息都应该被质疑，因为它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误的。

GRE写作范文：

Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.

To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.

However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.

Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.

To sum up，while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately，for the reason of the limitation of the abilities，I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves，as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis，I would arguer once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable，we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.

GRE写作高分范文：审查的公正性

GRE作文题目：

Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.

审查很少能够做到公正。

GRE写作正文：

“Censorship” is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic, which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship, which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome, it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while arousing applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma, is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy, or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in, at the risk of losing its own rampart.

Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech, writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good, it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision, and the word “common good” should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy, and the “common good” is the “monarch good”, then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages, both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of God; even now, in some authoritative countries, the censorship is used to rule its people by restricting their minds, of course, for the stability of their governing over the people. With these regards, censorship itself is questioned at the rationality of existing, regardless of the practices made by the democratic government, while the justice of the democratic government is quite doubtable.

The matter concerning is not only who practices the censorship but also how it is practiced. Since different men make different comments on the same work of art, for example, it is hard to set up a measure by which we could decide whether one should be prohibited, especially to the work of arts, as its content always labeled as “subversive” and “revolutionary”, two words detested by the governors most. Such cases could be found in Ulysses by J. Joyce and Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H Lawrence, these two great novels were firstly considered to be guilty of obscenity and were put to prohibition by the American government, but turned out to be true masterpieces today. So any form of censorship, to some extent, lags behind the development of ideas and will put more or less a negative effect on their development.

Though the censorship is such a disgusting word embodying so much oppression and might, it is a compromise we made with the reality far from being perfect, to provide a comparative stable ground which we could stand on. At this point, I don’t agree with the institute like ACLU who oppose any censorship. The censorship, though rarely justified, should exist as long as a more ideal and practical form is found to replace it, or we could only expect our God to create a more ideal species instead of imperfect human beings.