gre写作练习题怎么做好

gre考试是很多学子的重要事宜，那么你知道如何考好gre写作考试吗?今天小编给大家带来gre考试写作技巧详细解读，希望能够帮助到大家，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

gre考试写作技巧详细解读

gre写作技巧1 意见是最重要的

新的GRE作文不同于大多数英语写作能力。GRE作文考查你的观点和逻辑思维能力，而大部分英语写作都是关于语言能力的。在GRE中，这种思维能力分为争论和争论。在辩论中，我们需要在两分钟内找出原文中所有潜在的逻辑缺陷和推理问题。我们应该错误地发现和反思这些内容。这个问题有11个类别，如教育、行为主义、媒体和政治。GRE考试的官方要求是，考生可以对这些题目提出深入的分析和讨论，并据此提出自己的看法和意见。最困难的一点是，你必须给出适当的例子，这要求你在日常生活中积累更多，准备更多。最好的例子是：西方的道，避免使用太中国化的例子。

GRE写作技巧2 语言需要保证

提高你扎实运用英语的能力。尽管GRE作文要求相对较高的语言难度，但你做不到。首先，考生必须使用学术写作的方法，而不是口头表达。第二，整句与分句相结合，就是短句与长句交替出现，不显得空洞乏味。最后，避免重复单词和背诵更多的同义词。相同的词可以用同义词代替。语言进步的过程是漫长的，但是对于那些没有足够时间准备考试的学生来说，现在他们恐怕是本末倒置了。最后，准备一些模板，但这个模板不是供你在网上下载的，而是复制自己的模板。

GRE写作技巧3 逻辑结构是关键

由于学术写作的特殊性，文章的严密逻辑是评分的关键，逻辑结构可以分为段落内的逻辑结构和段落间的逻辑结构。我建议整篇文章应该用总分和总分的结构来写。同时，该款还应采用总分和总分的结构，使文章严谨完整。gre写作技巧,gre考试有什么用也就是说，首先要有话题设置，然后要跟上支撑设置，支撑设置也要有设计设置的支撑。另外，要学会如何熟练正确地使用连词，如hower，so，because等，因为你文章中的连词会直接影响你的写作总分，请记住。

GRE写作技巧4 在实践中寻找灵感

对于GRE写作来说，日常练习是必不可少的。只有通过不断的练习，才能把平时积累的好句子、好词汇运用到实践中去。通过长期实践，我们可以灵活运用GRE考试。同时，平时的做法也可以提高我们的写作灵感，快速提取出作者从试题中提出的目的，可以保证自己的写作不会脱题，因此写作水平的提高不是一蹴而就的，而是一个从量变到质变的过程。

GRE写作技巧5 养成良好的态度

广大gre写作考试考生要充分利用好模考，把模考当成真正的gre考试，不仅能考出自己以前的复习成绩，还能查到空缺，补上空缺。最重要的是在模拟考试中调整心态，用正常的心态去应对。良好的态度也是决定考试成绩的关键因素。

GRE Issue写作提分策略详解

写作提分策略

Issue准备：

练习观点的打磨：每个人都有自己的观点，这是非常好的，但是在应试考试中，不是所有的观点都建议去写：因为不一定能够在短时间内拿到很高的分数，所以观点也是需要进行筛选的。

观点选择之后的限时练习：不落笔写，永远都会有“我能写”的幻觉。10道issue不计时，锻炼自己的思考和落笔能力，11道开始计时，并不需要30分钟内写完，但是要有尽量缩短时间的意识;当熟悉写作文字和论证之后严格开始计时写。如果写作重要的话，至少练习20+。

高频题库的练习：GRE issue会有一定范围内的高频题库，对于上课的同学，老师们也会给出练习方向，所以需要练习写作;对于自学的同学，可以就相关话题进行google，或者和同学进行讨论，在说清楚道理后，可以进行英文写作，然后互相批改纠正。

GRE作文范文：广告与媒体的问题

GRE写作题目：

“Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that scholars' ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider audience，their ideas will have little use.”

近些年来，学科已经细化到了相当的程度以至于学者们的理念只影响小范围的人群。除非学者们能拥有影响等大范围的人群，否则他们的理念将几乎毫无用处。

GRE写作范文：

Although academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years，scholars' ideas can still reach a wide audience by the advantage of the knowledge structure. We can simply put that it is the human beings' knowledge structure that makes it possible for a scholar's ideas in his specialized discipline to reach a much wider audiences who don't necessarily belong to his own discipline.

The reason why I draw this conclusion will be illustrated by recalling the process of social evolution.

During the passed centuries，the social economy has been greatly boosted by the revolutions in science and technology，which in turn increases the width and depth of academic disciplines to solve unencountered and more complex problems arising in the new situations. To solve new problems，we probably need new methods. That will undoubtedly calls for invention of new ideas，which will certainly adds to human beings' knowledge. Thus with the progress of science and technology，more and more knowledge will be added to the old system. A new problem will come： how the newly obtained knowledge is organized. This problem will be clear when we make classification of the new knowledge according to the old knowledge system. If there is content of the newly-get that doesn't properly belong to any sort of the old system，it means anew discipline will emerge. But could we just assert that the newly formed discipline doesn't possess any relationship with any of the old ones? Certainly not. This is because the new knowledge is obtained through the old methods，which obviously means the new knowledge do have some connections with some old disciplines，otherwise I am quite sure we could not find it!

From the above，we can easily reach the conclusion that every academic discipline has certain relationships with some other ones. The structure of human's knowledge is just like the complexity of a net! And also it is a natural trend that academic disciplines become more and more specialized.

With the depositing and specializing process of knowledge，it causes humans to accommodate themselves to this situation. Because the God gives every person a limited time and energy，it is necessary for a person，who wants to make progress in his discipline，to adjust his knowledge structure to adapt to his research domain，that is to say，to be more devoted to his own research area. On the other hand，if he cares too much for unrelated or less related area，he will probably not be able to bring innovation to his main academic discipline. Simply put，we almost cannot find a man who constructs the Theory of Relativity and in the mean time composes symphony like Mozart's! So we can say every scholar must be more devoted to his own discipline than to others，but a wider knowledge of other disciplines sometimes involuntarily invokes sparks of new ideas.