gre考试写作者如何提速

gre考试的情况非常引人注意，大家是否了解gre写作考试呢?今天小编给大家带来gre考试写作高分策略分享，希望能够帮助到大家，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

gre考试写作高分策略分享

你需要一个gre写作策略

为什么很多考生在gre写作考试中会出现重复的问题?主要原因如下：

一。gre考试词汇储备不足

这是虚词单调的最常见原因。考生词汇量小，没有专门的文字训练和背诵，范文数量不够。没有足够的准备，他写不出各种各样的字，事实就是这样。

2.缺乏词汇掌握

作为一名合格的GRE考生，背诵大量单词是必要的。然而，在记忆单词的要求上也存在一些问题。很多人对GRE词汇背诵的要求只是相互熟悉，能够理解或大致理解词义，而很少有考生去了解句子中词汇的具体用法。这也使得考生知道了很多单词，看了大量的词汇，但当他们真正使用它们时，他们只能使用那些旧单词。

三。缺乏实践经验

一些考生可能已经意识到了背单词和掌握一些生词使用方法的重要性。然而，由于缺乏实践或无人帮助批改和复习，gre写作方法,gre写作怎么练他们不敢在实际写作中使用这些词。他们觉得自己不确定，害怕误用所以经过一轮之后，他们只能沿着一条稳定的道路，反复使用老字眼。

避免重复用词扣分

现在我们知道了重复问题的原因，相应的解决方案非常清楚。候选人需要做两件事：

一。特殊记忆写作词汇

首先，如果缺乏词汇，那么我们应该开始有意识地积累一些词汇，特别是专门用于写作的词汇。编辑建议考生可以参考GRE作文高分模式官方或权威出版物或黄金材料，从中收集一些用字不多但在模式中使用频率高的词汇，这些词汇不仅适合写作，而且可以带来高分，具有很高的实用价值。你可以在这方面积累更多的文字来代替写作和自己的习惯，这样会起到很好的效果，丰富文章的呈现形式。

2.积累更多经验

其次，如果考生害怕用生词制造问题，那么我们需要做的就是多练习。我们不必做一个完整的写作练习，我们可以专注于练习词汇替换，找到一些我们已经写过的文章，并用相同意思的词替换它们如果对词汇的使用不确定，可以通过QQ群论坛等方式查字典找例句或一般句子，帮助他人确定其使用方法，充分掌握词汇的正确使用方法，这样自然可以保证在考试中大胆使用生词，提高构词质量。

GRE作文范文：事物不会一成不变

Most people often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.

2018年GRE作文范文参考：

In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.

Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance, one

may not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, how it is produced or what its function is.What’s more, looking for similarities not only refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.

Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it is transparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs the function as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.

In the newly development software engineering model named Object-oriented model,the strategy “similarity first and differences later” functions as the core and focus of the whole model. Objects sharing common points are put into same “classes” and common points are processed together, later they are defined, discussed and processed respectively according to their own characteristics. This method greatly reduces the repetive time and energy spent over and over again on similar, if not utterly same, terms. Translated into daily life, starting from similarites for a quick outline and transferring to grasp distinctive characteristics for deeper understanding isthe approach we should always bear in mind when hoping to understand a thing with effectiveness and efficiency.

GRE作文范文：审查的公正性

Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.

“Censorship” is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic, which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship, which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome, it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while arousing applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma, is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy, or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in, at the risk of losing its own rampart.

Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech, writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good, it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision, and the word “common good” should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy, and the “common good” is the “monarch good”, then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages, both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of God; even now, in some authoritative countries, the censorship is used to rule its people by restricting their minds, of course, for the stability of their governing over the people. With these regards, censorship itself is questioned at the rationality of existing, regardless of the practices made by the democratic government, while the justice of the democratic government is quite doubtable.

The matter concerning is not only who practices the censorship but also how it is practiced. Since different men make different comments on the same work of art, for example, it is hard to set up a measure by which we could decide whether one should be prohibited, especially to the work of arts, as its content always labeled as “subversive” and “revolutionary”, two words detested by the governors most. Such cases could be found in Ulysses by J. Joyce and Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H Lawrence, these two great novels were firstly considered to be guilty of obscenity and were put to prohibition by the American government, but turned out to be true masterpieces today. So any form of censorship, to some extent, lags behind the development of ideas and will put more or less a negative effect on their development.

Though the censorship is such a disgusting word embodying so much oppression and might, it is a compromise we made with the reality far from being perfect, to provide a comparative stable ground which we could stand on. At this point, I don’t agree with the institute like ACLU who oppose any censorship. The censorship, though rarely justified, should exist as long as a more ideal and practical form is found to replace it, or we could only expect our God to create a more ideal species instead of imperfect human beings.