适当的应用雅思写作模板可以让大家的雅思写作备考更快更有效率，今天小编给大家带来了雅思写作模板分享agree/disagree题型，希望能够帮助到大家，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。
雅思写作模板分享agree/disagree题型
第一个雅思写作模板：
I full agree with the argument that (1) 支持观点 A. For one thing (2) 支持观点 A 的原因之一。
For another, (3) 支持观点 A 的原因之二。
History has told us that (4) 历史证明 A 的正确性。
For example, (5) 举例证明。
Furthermore, (6) 进一步阐述 A 的正确性。
But some people stubbornly cling to (7) 人们反对观点 A.
If we listen to these people we will (8) 听从那些人会产生的后果。
In conclusion, I think we should not (9) 我们不应该怎麽做。
On the contrary, we should (10) 我们应该怎麽做。
第二个雅思写作模板：
According to the opinion of some people , there are quite different attitudes towards AAA. Some claim that (1) 人们的观点 AAA. However, I cannot agree (2) 我反对观点 AAA.
First, (3) 我反对 AAA 的第一个理由。
That is to say (4) 进一步阐述。
Second, (5) 我反对 AAA 的第二个理由。
In fact, (6) 举例说明。
Finally, (7) 我反对 AAA 的第三个理由。
To sum up, (8) 总结我的观点。But it is also necessary to stress that (9) 退一步总结。
第三个雅思写作模板：
It is often said that (1) 题目所给的观点。Those who hold this view say that (2) 进一步阐述该观点。I disagree with this point of view for the following reasons.
The first and foremost one is (3) 我反对的理由之一。
History presented many examples(4) 举例说明。
My second reason is (5) 我反对的理由之二。
We can learn this from the saying “(6) 用一句谚语说明 ”.
Finally, it seems to be true that (7) 此处填入该观点的可取之处。But (8) 我反对的理由之三。
All in all, I firmly believe that (9) 总结我的观点。
剑桥雅思考官写作范文：Environmental protection
Topic: Environmental problems should be solved by the government instead of individuals and private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
题目：环境问题应该有政府来解决，而不是个人和私营企业。你是否赞同该观点?
剑桥雅思考官写作范文：
Environmental protection is no doubt a major issue confronting the modern society with the development of new technologies and the explosion of world population. While the issue is certainly relevant to each individual citizen and all the companies, some people contend that only the government should be concerned about protecting the environment. I concede that the government should lead the efforts in addressing the environmental problems. Nevertheless, cooperation and participation from the corporations and individual citizens are essential as well.
There is no doubt that the government is the agency that should play the leading roles in solving the environmental problems. To begin with, with the power to collect taxes from individual citizens and private companies, the government have the financial resources that are necessary to deal with environmental issues. In addition, the government may formulate policies to provide incentives for the companies and individuals to reduce the amount of pollution caused by their activities. Finally, the government is the only institution that may enact laws related to environmental problems.
On the other hand, without the cooperation and participation of individual citizens and private companies, the government's efforts to protect the environment would not be effective. For example, the government may launch a campaign to educate the public about the desirability of driving compact cars for reducing the air pollution. The campaign would make little difference if the individuals pay little attention to the information or do not care about the environment at all. Nor would the government's goal be achieved if the car manufacturers do not produce more compact cars for the market. In other words, the government alone cannot solve the problem of environment. It takes the collaborative efforts from individual and corporate citizens to improve the situation.
In conclusion, I agree that the government should take the responsibility to lead the society in addressing the problems of environmental pollution as it has the power and resources necessary to do so. Nonetheless, individual citizens and private companies have to be engaged if the government is to accomplish anything.
剑桥雅思考官写作范文：The media report crimes in details
Topic:Should the media report crimes in details?
题目：媒体报道犯罪活动时是否应该报道细节。
剑桥雅思考官写作范文：
Nowadays the media often cover news of crimes such as murder, rape and armed robbery in great details. While such information may warn the public of the potential danger and help reduce crimes, providing too much information about crimes might lead to certain negative side effects. In my opinion, the information about crimes should be made accessible to the public but the media should refrain from reporting crimes in an irresponsible manner.
To begin with, there is no doubt that people should have the right to information about crimes committed in a community. If someone in the neighbourhood were murdered, the chance of other people being killed would also increase. The people should be notified of the event as well as any actions the authorities had taken immediately. Any attempts to block the news about the crimes would violate people's right to know the truth. Yet, the necessity of informing the public does not mean full details have to be disclosed.
Admittedly, the best way to alert the public about a recent crime being committed is through the reporting by the media. Most of us read newspaper and watch TV news everyday. But there are a number of reasons why the media should only report the crimes briefly and let any interested parties follow up with the events by themselves. To begin with, the details of the crimes may cause discomfort and even panic among the members of the public. This is particularly true for the young children in the society. In addition, the time on TV and the space on the newspaper are scarce resources that can be utilized in many different ways. Therefore, the detailed reporting of the crimes would incur high opportunity costs as the public attention would have been directed to other important issues such as education and environment. Finally, the full information about crimes may be made available through the police or other government agencies so that anyone interested in the events may consult the records. Such arrangement would be less costly compared to reporting the details via the media.
In conclusion, since crimes are relevant to each and every member of the society, the media should report the events as soon as possible to alert the public and to help prevent more crimes. Nevertheless, the reports of crimes should be relatively brief in order to avoid public panic and to save the precious TV time and newspaper space. Furthermore, anyone who wants to know more about certain events should be allowed to consult the government agencies for such
