gre考试写作成绩越高越好吗

gre考试令很多学子发愁，到底gre写作考试该如何提分呢?哪些gre写作考试方法值得借鉴呢?下面小编就和大家分享gre考试写作方式哪些值得借鉴，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

gre考试写作方式哪些值得借鉴?

四种gre写作考试方法

1。GRE写作考试有练习题：

为了达到公平，在考试中公布所有的写作试题，以达到能力和本土。

演讲者互相竞争。考生应在考试前预习所有试题(节省考试时间)，通过撰写100-150篇大纲了解GRE写作的总体结构，通过撰写30-50篇文章练习写作思路和表达方式。练习题里的试题越熟练，考试就越好。

2。gre写作考试以计件方式进行评估：

每个评论员都很快地评论你的文章。不可能把每一个细节都看得很仔细。考生要迎合阅卷人的阅卷思维，用最规范的结构和最清晰的表达方式来反映自己的思维：第一段要明确提出自己的观点，第二段要开放，每段的开头应该是该段的主题句。

三。gre考试写作得分是整体得分：

首先，根据公布的各评分部分的评分标准，评分主要集中在以下三个方面：1)逻辑分析能力(洞察力要求);2)条理清晰的要求;3)语言能力(标准书面英语;简明要求;可变结构要求)。

但也强调，评级是整体性的，而不是从各个角度分别打分。这表明，虽然中国考生的语言能力很弱，但他们可以得到6分，,gre写作方法,gre写作怎么练只要他们能给评论者留下深刻印象的其他两个角度。因此，当我们在短期内尽最大努力提高语言能力(语言能力的培养不能在一两天内完成)时，我们应该在复习时尽可能深入地分析这个话题。学习高分作文的结构，通过这两方面的突破，迅速提高作文的总分。

4。GRE写作的两部分在总分中的权重相同：

由于aa的写作不涉及自身观点的发展，只需要指出作者的逻辑漏洞，因此经过训练后写作并不困难;而ai的写作需要发展自己的思想，不仅需要逻辑洞察力的能力，同时也具备一定的论证能力和语言组织能力。中国考生很难在短时间内提高。但是，这两部分在总分中的权重是一样的，所以考生的策略应该是尽量提高人工智能部分的写作能力，尽量保持人工智能部分的满分(或高分)。

因为如果AA部分满分，AI部分只需争取4分以上，就能保证作文总分在5分以上。其次，评分标准和作文评分的计算参照了过度评价模型。我们可以很容易地发现，评分标准中的问题和论点都有共同点：第一，观点要深刻，论证要有说服力;第二，组织要有条理，表达要清晰准确;第三、语言要流利;句型复杂，词汇丰富。这三者分别是关于文本的“思想性”、“结构性”和“表现性”。大多数高分考生在这三个方面表现都很好。从这里入手，采用“各个击破”的方法，剖析GRE作文的精髓，从而得到一个理想的分数，这是很自然的。

如何练习GRE写作

疯狂的作家一开始总是不理智的，特别是当他们写第一期和第一次辩论的时候。aw的真正提高是在写作的过程中，但在这之前一定要读一定数量的书。

我个人的观点是，在积累一定量后，我可以写几篇文章，找出最弱的部分，最需要从文章中加强部分，然后找到解决的办法。在最近一个月左右的时间里，我将进行一次模型考试培训。在熟悉GRE作文练习题和模型文本和作文要求后，我可以试着写一篇，然后找出差距。语言和例子如下：最好是积累之前，但如果积累不够，你也可以先写一篇文章，然后比较。

GRE写作高分范文：现代摄像机和印刷术

“The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records.”

摄像机可以通过如此精确而有力的记录手段来再现当代生活，因此它已经代替书面记录成为了一种更重要的记录手段。

GRE写作范文：

“The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records.”There have been many methods of documenting in the history of human， from carved ancient pottery to sheepskin documents， of which the video camera may be the newest form with certain superiorities and inferiorities to written records. The advantages of video camera certainly make it an important form of documentation， but not to the extent of being more essential than written records due to its disadvantages.

To begin with， video can be interpreted as a series of pictures associated along the time， while written records can be considered as the descriptions of these pictures.Therefore， it is undoubtedly that video contains much more information than that of written records. From a video， we can clearly know what happened with subtle details.Merely with a television set， we can easily watch the happenings at home， such as the Olympic Games， comfortably sitting on the sofa， needless to be present on the spot.

And more excitedly， certain close-up enables us to scrutinize our favorable athletes. If there isn‘t video camera， we may be unable to enjoy such activities unless we can afford time and expense to be on the spot. While it is true that we can also be acquainted with the circumstances through newspaper or other media， however， the written record may be unable to present them as accurate as video. The imagination from the reports， however detailed， dooms to be imaginary， by all means different from the real circumstance， which video can represent. Moreover， the written records may contain some mistakes due to the carelessness or injustice of its reporters， while the video may be more accurate and convincing.

Another strongpoint of video is that it can be perceived simply by visual signals， from which people mainly get information in their daily lives， and therefore this method is more natural than written records. Everyone， ranging from a babbling child to an old grandpa， is able to get some information from the video just as they do during their daily lives， regardless of their literate ability. While the written record， no matter how easily it is represented， requires literacy of its readers， and a newspaper or book means nothing to an illiterate person. In addition， video is much easier to comprehend for people all over the world. For instance， an American can grasp nothing about a story written in Chinese unless s/he has learnt such a foreign language. However， s/he can absolutely understand something about a video recorded in China， although s/he may be confused with the language spoken in the video.

While video is certainly not superior to written recorders in all aspects， its limitations determine that the written record will not be replaced at least at present. The first disadvantage of video is that it is much more inconvenient and expensive. Video must be recorded on the spot， namely， when an event happens to you， you cannot record it unless you have a camera at hand. However， even though you haven’t paper and pencil either， you are still able to recall it to record based on your remembrance.

Therefore， for those who can’t afford a handy camera or who are unwilling to bring it anytime anywhere， the written records may be the easiest form available. Further， another weakness of video is that its cost is too high and its correspondingly high-quality record may be beyond people‘s requirement. The cost of making a written report is much less than that of manipulating a video. Also， every morning we may browse a newspaper to know what happened throughout the world， and the simple report， which may only consume us a few seconds， meets our needs of curiosity; we needn’t the accuracy and vividness of video， which may be more time-consuming.

GRE写作高分范文：技术与学习的矛盾

Although innovations such as video，computers，and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students，these technologies all too often distract from real learning.

尽管诸如电视、电脑和互联网这样的发明似乎给学校教育提供了进步的手段，但是所有这些技术往往也是在偏离真正的学习。

GRE写作题库范文：

Nowadays there is a growing concern about the role that innovations have played in the field of learning. While most people think that innovations benefit learning process in various ways，different opinions arise that these technology advancements actually distract students from real learning. On balance，according to my personal observation,whether innovations can be beneficial or detrimental to real learning depends on the students and the teachers，not on these innovations themselves.

To begin with，technological innovations do help teaching and learning in various ways.With the aid of these technologies，the process of teaching and learning can be shorter and easier than before. For instance，if a student want certain published papers of an academic discipline，he/she may look through considerable catalogs to find the ones he/she needs. However，with the help of Internet innovation，at present most of these papers are published online. Consequently，to find certain paper the procedure is much easier and shorter，the students just type the key words and other information of the paper，and then the system will search the database，and the papers are there waiting for them. As this new approach can save a lot of time for the students，he/she could have more time reading the papers and absorbing the knowledge rather than checking and looking for the papers that could be a waste of his/her time. This example aptly illustrates how technology advancement benefited the students and their learning process.

Secondly，while innovations can help learning in various ways，it is more important that the central role of the pursuit for knowledge and wisdoms are maintained. What real matters is not the approach but the purpose of learning. In India，where modern technologies are less applied to the learning process than in the US and other developed countries，still a lot of distinguished students achieved their academic goal with their hard work and desires to knowledge. In the US，where the software engineering students are given the most advanced facilities and apparatus for their learning and research，however，it is wildly accepted that they are far less outstanding compared to the Indian students of software，who may share computers in groups. From this comparison we can see that the real and core push of learning is the desire for knowledge，not the help of innovations.

In addition，if not guided properly，the technology advancement might inhibit learning.In other words，innovation can distract the students from real learning than helping them. It is obvious that a computer can help students of science to calculate mathematical equations but can also be used for recreation such as net surfing or computer games. It is highly possible that these students can spend more time and energy on recreations rather than learning when using a computer. Thus，learning is inhibited. Under this circumstance，guidance and restrictions are needed to ensure the right use of innovations for learning，or the consequence may be on the contrary to the students and teachers' desire.