gre考试写作方式哪些值得借鉴

gre写作考试是很多学子的提分重点，你知道如何进行gre写作考试练习吗?提升gre考试分数还需要这四种方法，下面小编就和大家分享gre写作考试提分还要注意方式方法，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

gre写作考试提分还要注意方式方法

gre写作考试练习题：

为了达到公平，在考试中公布所有的写作试题，以达到能力和本土。

演讲者互相竞争。考生应在考试前预习所有试题(节省考试时间)，通过撰写100-150篇大纲了解GRE写作的总体结构，通过撰写30-50篇文章练习写作思路和表达方式。练习题里的试题越熟练，考试就越好。

gre写作考试以计件方式进行评估：

每个评论员都很快地评论你的文章。不可能把每一个细节都看得很仔细。考生应迎合阅卷人的阅卷思维，gre写作方法, gre备考要多久用最规范的结构和最清晰的表达方式来反映自己的思维：第一段要明确提出自己的观点，中间段要打开，每段的开头应该是该段的主题句。

GRE写作得分是整体得分：

首先，根据公布的各评分环节的评分标准，评分主要集中在以下三个方面：1)逻辑分析能力(洞察力要求);2)条理清晰的要求;3)语言能力(标准书面英语;简明要求;可变结构要求)。

但也强调，评级是整体性的，而不是从各个角度分别打分。这说明，虽然中国考生的语言能力较弱，但只要能从另外两个角度给评论员一个非常深刻的感受，就可以得到6分。因此，在短时间内努力提高语言能力的同时(语言能力的培养不能在一两天内完成)，在复习时要尽量对题目进行透彻的分析，学习高分作文的结构，迅速提高总分通过对这两个方面的突破。

GRE写作的两部分在总分中的权重相同：

由于aa的写作不涉及自身观点的发展，只需要指出作者的逻辑漏洞，因此经过训练后写作并不困难;而ai的写作则需要发展自己的观点，不仅需要逻辑洞察力，还需要展示观点的能力，而且语言组织能力强，gre写作方法, gre备考要多久所以对中国考生来说很难。在这段时间里，情况有了很大改善。但是，这两部分在总分中的权重是一样的，所以考生的策略应该是尽量提高人工智能部分的写作能力，尽量保持人工智能部分的满分(或高分)。

因为如果AA部分满分，AI部分只需争取4分以上，就能保证作文总分在5分以上。其次，的评分标准和作文评分的计算，参照了的夸大模型。我们很容易发现，在评分标准上，议题和论点都有共同点：一是观点要深刻，论点要有说服力;二是组织要有条理，表达要清晰准确;三是语言流畅，句型复杂，词汇丰富。这三者分别是关于文本的“思想性”、“结构性”和“表现性”。大多数高分考生在这三个方面表现都很好。从这里入手，采用“各个击破”的方法，剖析GRE作文的精髓，从而得到一个理想的分数，这是很自然的。

GRE写作高分范文：权威问题

Much of the information that people assume is‘factual’actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.

大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不准确的。因此，任何据称是事实的信息都应该被质疑，因为它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误的。

GRE写作范文：

Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.

To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.

However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of

cognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.

Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.

GRE写作高分范文：过度专业化问题

GRE写作题目：

“Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that scholars' ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider audience，their ideas will have little use.”

近些年来，学科已经细化到了相当的程度以至于学者们的理念只影响小范围的人群。除非学者们能拥有影响等大范围的人群，否则他们的理念将几乎毫无用处。

GRE写作范文：

Although academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years，scholars' ideas can still reach a wide audience by the advantage of the knowledge structure. We can simply put that it is the human beings' knowledge structure that makes it possible for a scholar's ideas in his specialized discipline to reach a much wider audiences who don't necessarily belong to his own discipline.

The reason why I draw this conclusion will be illustrated by recalling the process of social evolution.

During the passed centuries，the social economy has been greatly boosted by the revolutions in science and technology，which in turn increases the width and depth of academic disciplines to solve unencountered and more complex problems arising in the new situations. To solve new problems，we probably need new methods. That will undoubtedly calls for invention of new ideas，which will certainly adds to human beings' knowledge. Thus with the progress of science and technology，more and more knowledge will be added to the old system. A new problem will come： how the newly obtained knowledge is organized. This problem will be clear when we make classification of the new knowledge according to the old knowledge system. If there is content of the newly-get that doesn't properly belong to any sort of the old system，it means a

new discipline will emerge. But could we just assert that the newly formed discipline doesn't possess any relationship with any of the old ones? Certainly not. This is because the new knowledge is obtained through the old methods，which obviously means the new knowledge do have some connections with some old disciplines，otherwise I am quite sure we could not find it!

From the above，we can easily reach the conclusion that every academic discipline has certain relationships with some other ones. The structure of human's knowledge is just like the complexity of a net! And also it is a natural trend that academic disciplines become more and more specialized.

With the depositing and specializing process of knowledge，it causes humans to accommodate themselves to this situation. Because the God gives every person a limited time and energy，it is necessary for a person，who wants to make progress in his discipline，to adjust his knowledge structure to adapt to his research domain，that is to say，to be more devoted to his own research area. On the other hand，if he cares too much for unrelated or less related area，he will probably not be able to bring innovation to his main academic discipline. Simply put，we almost cannot find a man who constructs the Theory of Relativity and in the mean time composes symphony like Mozart's! So we can say every scholar must be more devoted to his own discipline than to others，but a wider knowledge of other disciplines sometimes involuntarily invokes sparks of new ideas.