短期内如何提高雅思写作水平

雅思写作部分，小作文要与大作文简单一些。不过，对于雅思写作小作文，我们也绝对不能放松警惕。下面小编就和大家分享雅思写作小作文什么不能写，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

雅思写作小作文什么不能写

雅思小作文不能写的内容1、分析图表背后的原因

此为中国学生都已经有的习惯性毛病，写作文时都喜欢写上为什么。雅思小作文属于客观性写作，要求的只是通过图表描述和总结，不可以把为什么写上，不需要解释。参照剑5 TEST 1中曲线图，日本在2030年左右65岁人口数量预计要陡增，但大家要的只是写出事实，根本不需要写出陡增的原因!

雅思小作文不能写的内容2、连接词我用了，句子之间的连接也有了，完成文章也没问题了

雅思写作考试在评分标准第二点中明确提到了Coherence and Cohesion(连贯与衔接)，能够看出是一个很重要的得分参考点。而大部分中国学生的作文里已经充满了then, after, before等如此单调的低级连接词，得分肯定自然不会上去。合理的使用一些从句，关联词会使你的句子看起来更加精炼和有创意。

雅思小作文不能写的内容3、趋势描写是increase和decrease以及level off

大家当描写趋势的上升又或是下降时经常需要的只是使用到了一个increase & decrease+副词的模式。大家根本不清楚对上升下降的描写大家能够采取起码3种的描写方式动词+副词，形容词+名词以及把上升下降的词换做形容词来使用。这也正好避免了评分标准四Grammatical Range and Accuracy(语法范围与精确)中的陷阱。

雅思写作范文：学生是否需要学习国际新闻

Should secondary students study international news as one of their study projects. one think it is a waste of their valuable study time. Discuss both and tell your opinion.

中学生是否应该把学习国际新闻作为学习项目之一?有人认为这是浪费他们宝贵的学习时间。讨论双方观点并给出你的观点。

思路分析：

1. 不该学： 国际新闻对于学生当地的社会而言太过遥远，和他们每天的学习和生活毫不相关。举例，国外的各种政治丑闻，罢工，或是股票的起起落落，都无法教会孩子们去了解当地社会，或是帮助他们取得更好的学校考试成绩。

2. 应该学： 首先，学习国际新闻开阔了学生的视野。举例，通过学习国际新闻中的国外文化元素，孩子们能掌握一种跨文化理解力，这让他们的海外旅行和留学不会犯二。

3. 还有，国际文化帮助孩子们变的更加成熟。举例，在富裕的国家，孩子们总是花钱大手大脚，因为他们的成长环境太安逸。当他们看看那些关于非洲战乱，饥饿和死亡的国际新闻之后，他们能学会珍惜他们的生活。

参考范文：

The world today has become quite dynamic and news stories develop almost every minute. Some people think reviewing the international news need to become a high school subject while another group disagrees. In my opinion, studying the news across the globe can shape these young viewers as well-informed citizens.

Admittedly, the main reason against such news is that it has nothing to do with students’ daily lives. For example, the breaking news in other countries or continents--such as political scandals, work strikes, ups and downs of stock market exchange, is too far from the regional situations to provide practical knowledge or instructions for local students. All they see and hear from the international news fail to reflect the truth and day-to-day changes of local community around them, or to improve their studying performance, or to teach them self-care skills for dealing with the challenges in a real world. In addition, the negative news from other countries including natural disasters, social violence and crimes, unnecessarily shock these young minds, thus trapping them into nervousness and anxiety. On this level, the assertion about the international news wasting time is proper.

However, I strongly believe the international news is highly valuable, to a large extent. Firstly, it is a wonderful means by which students’ minds can be broadened. For example, the international news reports inevitably contain a foreign culture from a certain country--from social manners to languages, from food to religious rituals. By being exposed to the exotic information, students can build up a cross-culture understanding, and their thoughts would become more flexible, adaptable and patient, when encountering with the cultural diversity in future travelling and studying abroad.

Besides, international news plays a role of catalyst for the maturity of youngsters. Actually, many teenagers in some rich countries are overindulged because they grow up in a peaceful, affluent, safe and healthy environment. More or less, they might squander money with no restraint. However, when watching the pictures and stories about Africa, like the massive starvation, epidemics, and the homelessness and death caused by civil wars, they begin to realize how happy their lives are. Then they can learn to spend money in moderation, cherish food and clothes, as well as turn into kind and charitable people with a willing of giving.

In conclusion, for young students in schools, there are more advantages of studying the global news over its disadvantages. Although it is possible that such studying is unpractical for their academic scores in school education or for daily lives, its benefits in cultivating youngsters as well-qualified generations with open, comprehensive and mature thoughts, can never be ignored.

雅思写作范文：科技提高食品质量

Task：

It is known to all that the technological and scientific advances have made greater changes to the range and quality of our food. Some people regard it as an improvement while others believe that the change is harmful. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

随着科学技术的进步，食品的种类，质量都有了提高。有人认为这种现象是好的，也有人觉得这样是有害的。讨论双方观点，并给出你的意见。

Sample answer：

When it comes to the issue about how to judge the use of technologies on food, some people may argue that it contributes to a wider range of available food with better quality for human beings, but others believe that such advances may bring detriments to people’s health.

On one hand, thanks to the modern technologies, human beings are potent to enjoy a wider range of food than before. In the past, people could only enjoy some specific food in specific seasons, such as watermelon in summer. However, with the development of modern technologies, such as the green house, it is also available for individuals to enjoy watermelon in any season they like. Thus, the range of food has been exactly enlarged a lot due to the technological progress.

On the other hand, some potential risks may also exist with the utilization of technologies. It is acknowledged that scientists are eager to explore the mystery of transgene technologies and have adopted some technologies on food. However, the public may be fearful of such new product and even parade to resist transgene food since they cannot know whether some ingredients, after being altered by scientists, would do harm to their health. Considering the short history of transgene food, it is also understandable that human beings are reluctant to accept this new technology.

From my own perspective, it may be inevitable for human beings to adopt some scientific technologies to improve the range and quality of food, especially with the hybrid rice largely alleviating the famine worldwide. However, the possibility of negative consequences caused by it may not be ignored, either. Governments and scientists should be more responsible for their behavior and more scientific researches should be carried out to guarantee that the side effect of new food should be minimal. After all, what human beings intend through technologies on food is a better life, but not death.