GRE写作高频作文都在用什么句式

GRE作文虽然题库公开，但想要练好写作需要花费大量时间精力。许多对作文得分要求不高同时缺乏备考时间的考生因此往往会借助写作模板来达到保分要求。下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作谁说不能用模板，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE作文模板怎么背最有效?

既然要背模板，那么考生就需要一些具体并且正确的背诵和使用方法以发挥出模板的最大价值。对于GRE作文模板的背诵和使用，关键其实很简单，那就是活记活用。

具体来说，就是不要死记硬背，一字不差地强行塞进脑子里。最好能把模板里的句子转化成自己习惯的写作表达方式，转换的过程本身会加深记忆，真的到了使用的时候也能更加顺利地写出来。

同时，GRE考试对于作文是有着雷同的判定规则的。模板大多来自于一些经典的高分满分范文，如果考生写出来的内容跟模板一模一样，那么就很有可能被判定成雷同抄袭，后果将会十分严重。因此，灵活地背诵和使用模板，才能发挥出其最大的价值。

GRE写作背模板最佳时机分析

有些考生可能会觉得奇怪，背模板这种事情，不是应该越早做越好吗?为什么要等到考前3天才是最佳时机呢?其实主要有两个原因。

1. 参考最新预测减少记忆

相信绝大部分GRE考生在考试前都会选择看一些考试预测真题，也许只是为了求个心安，也许真是实力不足想抱佛脚。无论出于何种目的，看预测题本身还是有好处的。特别是GRE作文的预测题，虽然不能说百分百命中，至少能看出个出题的大致方向和范围。再加上GRE考试本身作文题目就是官方公开的，只要两相结合一下，就能大幅度缩小可能出现的作文题目范围。如此一来，背模板才会更有针对性，才能更好地发挥出效果。否则面对几百个可能出现的作文题目，就算背模板也要背到天荒地老了。

2. 短期内不会遗忘效果最佳

人的记忆是有惯性和规律的。提前背好模板，如果之后不经常重复记忆，很容易就会遗忘。GRE考试需要背诵的东西本来就不少，英语词汇、数学名词公式等等，背过的都知道压力巨大。如果还要加上经常背模板，难免会出现背了很久又忘了的情况。考前几天记忆，可以保留最鲜活的印象，3天内背过的东西，想必大家的记忆力还不至于糟糕到那么快就忘了。因此，选在这个时间点背模板可以说是恰到好处。

为什么GRE作文保分要背模板?

一些对作文颇有心得的考生常会对用模板这种做法瞧不上眼。但并不是人人都是写作高手，模板的主要价值体现在稳妥两字。具体表现在：

1. 降低GRE写作环节时间分配难度

GRE作文时间要求是很高的。30分钟的时间内要写完一篇质量不低的作文，对大部分考生来说都不是一件轻松的任务。通过使用作文模板，大家可以节省下不少时间，有更多地时间用来构思和琢磨遣词造句等细节问题。整体上提升作文的质量。

2. 提前预备写作思路缩短审题环节

GRE作文是议论文，讲究逻辑论证和文章框架。提前准备好模板可以帮助考生理顺写作思路，搭建好文章结构。而不会因为思路不顺畅，还要边写边想，这样做出来的文章质量必然要打折扣。

3. 保证GRE写作3分左右的稳妥得分

GRE作文评分要求严格。想要拿到高分，出奇制胜并不是一个好选择，弄巧成拙反而不美。与其如此，还不如写出一篇虽然不出彩却中规中矩挑不出大错的文章。特别是如果考生本身的写作能力并不算太出色，使用模板至少可以保证拿到一个合格的保底分数。

GRE作文模板使用风险介绍

当然，凡事有利就有弊。GRE写作使用模板同样也有需要注意的地方。那就是模板并非救命稻草。如果考生本身作文功底差，平时又不肯花时间练习写作打好基础，而是把所有希望寄托在模板上，那么万一考试的时候模板不能套用，就会陷入相当尴尬的境地。建议大家不要盲目依赖模板，无论如何，练好写作真功夫才是根本。

总而言之，GRE写作备考中背一下模板还是很有价值的。考生如果申请专业本身对作文得分并没有特别要求，大家只需要考出3-3.5左右的写作成绩即可，那么背模板无疑就是最高效实用的作文备考保分方法了。希望大家能够认真学习上文内容并在写作部分取得满意成绩。

GRE作文范文：Success

GRE作文练习题目：Success

Success, whether academic or professional, involves an ability to survive in a new environment and, eventually, to change it.

成功，无论是学术上的还是职业上的，都涉及了适应新环境并最终改变新环境的能力。

GRE作文范文：

Many wonder the intrinsic impact of industrial revolution over the last century. Is it a blessing or a curse? Ever since the invention of steam engine, mass production enabled factories to make out products in a madly efficient manner, while machines also supplanted innumerous traditionally skilled artisan, forcing them out of work. Gone are the days when they boasted of their craftsmanship that they assumed to be able support their family all their life. Consumers became more aspiring to novel design instead of durability as goods were made to be discarded.

Hundreds years later, with the first installation of integrated circuit on the chip, another profound turnover took place. Now the computer pervades our life so much that one may find himself half illiterate in absence of input skill. This time, thousands of jobs were created in Silicon Valley, transforming some of the few into billionaire over one night. Nevertheless, the original inventor might not expect that the ensuing slow down and thus recession in IT sector would approach so soon in less than 10 years, which is obviously less than a presumable 15 years time normal for a periodical change.Positive or negative, one mark that characterizes the technological bombardment indicates a constant fact: changes exist ubiquitously and operating at an ever-increasing tempo; those who fail to catch up with the torrent of change would ineluctably engulfed by billows, floating no where and eventually dissolve as negligible bubbles.

Favors as well as opportunities goes to who adapt to the contemporary trend. Fully recognizing this axiom, long before the scientists announced accomplishment of sketches of human genes or earlier successful cloning of Doris, candidates preparing for university admission have smelt the sense. Today, in the U.S., biology and its branch disciplines become the first choice for top students of senior high, determining that this subject, foretold as the third wave in technology, could bring them brilliant future as “Bill Gates” dreamt the same in the previous wave.

In addition to academic realm, respect would be paid to people who though deprived of their past secure professions, choose not to be a loser in the whimsical society. Like the artisans who lost jobs, a vast number of skilled laborer in China’s city of Wengzhou have undergone darkness and depression in those old days. However, after years of endeavor and refinement, they prove their value again. By accurately posit the economic trend and market demand, they play an active role in almost all economic sectors, garments, catering and lodging, hi-tech industry, you name it.

While ability honed in surviving the fickleness of the world makes the path through success shorter, it is essential for the more ambitious to acquire the pith of reformist and lead the trend. In this way, it could help him distinguish from the mediocracy and platitude. This is absolutely not an easy task. Inborn insight and foresight are needed to tell uncommon out of the commonplace; extraordinary perseverance and encouragement is a must to face the coming challenges against his iconoclasm. Very few people crowned with triumph possess this quality, whether the Nobel Prize winner or those who makes coverage on the Times.

In sum, as shown in the course of history, success, whether academic or professional,involves an ability to surviving in a new environment and---, eventually, ---to change it.Now some elite persons have again forecast that another social change is impending.Are you ready for that?

GRE作文范文：laws

GRE写作练习题目：laws

It is possible to pass laws that control or place limits on people's behavior， but legislation cannot reform human nature. Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts and minds.

通过法律可以控制或者限制人们的行为，但是立法是无法改变人类本性的。法律无法改变人们的感情和思想。

GRE写作范文：

Ever since the Code of Hammurapi comes into being， laws have begun to put restrictions on people's behaviors and have played an important role in the maintenance of social order. But aside from its impact on shaping public deportment， legislation is of no avail to reform human nature as well as mankind thoughts.

Our collective life experience is that we make choices and decisions every day--under a legal system. No one is ever granted the rights to surpass the boundary of laws; otherwise there may be lack of protection for private property and personal right from being violated. Common sense tells us that the laws will punish the wrongdoers severely sometimes so harshly even to sentence the felons to death. It is the awe to controlling authority as well as the fear of castigation that made most of the people away from the illicit behaviors. Laws， for better or worse， have put up a paradigm on which people abide by， for the sake of personal interests and the social stability as well.

Laws can exert their influences on people's “hands and legs”， but when it comes to man's hearts and minds， it cannot. In the long history of its development， laws change over time and vary from region to region not to alter human nature but to be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances， times and places. The end of a legal system impels laws to evolve to keep pace with changing mores， customers， and our collective sense of equity but with little concern for the reconstruction of human thoughts. Bigamy， to be commonly regarded as illegal in most countries， is yet legitimate in some Arabian countries. For Islamic， outlawing bigamy seems an impinge upon their religious freedom of choosing mates. Instead of bringing about a revolution in the conception of marriage among Islamic disciples， laws give way to the entrenched customers. Still more， from the psychotic analysis angle， that laws will change nature is further doubted. Sigmund Freud has divided the individual personality into threefold： the id， the ego and the super ego. The ego， as the surface of the nature and the part you show the world， is governed by the “reality principle，” otherwise known as laws.

However， so powerless are laws to extend its impacts on the id and the superego remains below， each has its own significant effects on the personality. A rapist， for example， despite years of imprisonment may still relapse into outrages in that laws fail to civilize the id desires composing of instinctual drives. By no means can laws alone alter our nature. Were laws by itself be able to cause a change in the human nature and exercise a fundamental influence on people's hearts and minds， then it would probably be no need for its existence. People at no time can ever have imagined this.

In fact， to truly change the human nature， it is through the synergic efforts associating the education， moral and ethic social interactions altogether that brought about a reconstruction of human nature.

In conclusion， in spite the fact that we may live in a harmonious society with the implementation of the laws， it seems unthinkable for laws to undertake the role as a reformer in rebuilding man's nature as well as hearts and minds.