托福写作模板使用攻略

托福写作无论是写得太多还是太少对于评分都会产生负面影响。而对于托福作文具体要写多少字才能拿到更为理想的成绩很多考生其实也并不清楚。下面小编就和大家分享托福写作文章写多少字才能拿高分，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

托福写作文章写多少字才能拿高分

托福作文包含信息才是分数高低关键所在

托福写作的字数与成绩之间存在一个调节阀：信息量。当我们阅读一些出自native speaker的英语文章时，会发现他们能够用最精炼的语言表达出许多信息量。打个比方，他们用1句话就能表达出6个信息点;而我们或许1句话最多也只能表达3个信息点。那我们就需要比他们多花一倍的笔墨去说同样信息容量的故事。如果你的语言能力够好，那么就会削弱字数的影响。但遗憾的是，我们大多数人并不具备这样的能力，因此字数仍旧是一个不可忽视的部分。

托福作文篇幅字数介绍

想要了解托福作文的字数范围，最好的途径就是从官方发布的各类高分满分范文中来寻找答案。根据许多托福老师的数据统计，小编在此给出一个结论，那就是一般而言，托福写作比较合理的字数范围是：综合写作230到270字，;独立写作450字左右。如果你的作文字数范文能够控制在这个区间内，那么假如文章本身的质量也没有太大问题，就能得到一个更为理想的分数了。

独立综合写作不同字数要求需合理控制

虽然有了数据结果，但是实际上写作中想要控制好字数篇幅并非易事，小编相信很多同学都遇到过突然写不出来或者写得停不下来的情况。那么考生具体怎么做才能控制好自己的作文篇幅字数呢?

先看综合写作，综合写作中是不需要表达考生自己的观点和想法的，需要的是阅读的信息、听力的信息、阅读与听力的关联，简言之就是“阅读归纳总结，听力力争还原”。考生只是一个转述者，其中主次一定是听力高于阅读。综合的阅读会重现，在你敲写作的时候会重现，作为一场语言考试，你对着屏幕搬运体现了任何语言能力了吗?没有。而听力却是一遍过，它考察了你的语言能力和重要信息收集的能力，所以相比于听力，阅读的信息绝对不会是重点。总结来看，综合写作是转述别人的观点，从这一点上来说，综合的判分是按点给分，只要语法和布局没有大问题，你的信息点踩到多少就给你多少的分，字数要求方面反而是其次的，考生只要能保证覆盖到所有信息点，那么字数篇幅上控制在250个字左右就可以了。

再看独立写作，对于大多数的考生来说，作文的字数越多，语法错误、拼写错误也会越多。虽然ETS对于语法和拼写有一定的容错，但小编还是不希望大家主动去试探语法拼写的扣分边缘。对于大多数主动或被动受训过的考生来说，托福独立写作主体段三段每一段130词基本能够算是展开充分了(如一开始所说的，字数不是唯一的判断标准，还要看你的内容和信息量)，加上开头段和结尾段，这才有了450字左右的说法。同时，如果我们对自己的实力没有一个准确认知的话，多打字其实也是一种额外的消耗。

以上就是小编为大家分析的托福作文字数篇幅和实际得分之间的关系。合理规划自己的文章篇幅是一种很需要多加练习才能掌握的技巧，希望通过本文的内容介绍，考生能够更好地安排好自己的写作篇幅，不再让字数问题影响自己的写作思路。

托福写作模板:英法战争

The war between Britain and France

In the late eighteenth century, battles raged in almost every corner of Europe, as well as in the Middle East, south Africa ,the West Indies, and Latin America. In reality, however, there was only one major war during this time, the war between Britain and France. All other battles were ancillary to this larger conflict, and were often at least partially related to its antagonist’ goals and strategies. France sought total domination of Europe . this goal was obstructed by British independence and Britain’s efforts throughout the continent to thwart Napoleon; through treaties. Britain built coalitions (not dissimilar in concept to today’s NATO) guaranteeing British participation in all major European conflicts. These two antagonists were poorly matched, insofar as they had very unequal strengths; France was predominant on land, Britain at sea. The French knew that, short of defeating the British navy, their only hope of victory was to close all the ports of Europe to British ships. Accordingly, France set out to overcome Britain by extending its military domination from Moscow t Lisbon, from Jutland to Calabria. All of this entailed tremendous risk, because France did not have the military resources to control this much territory and still protect itself and maintain order at home.

French strategists calculated that a navy of 150 ships would provide the force necessary to defeat the British navy. Such a force would give France a three-to-two advantage over Britain. This advantage was deemed necessary because of Britain’s superior sea skills and technology because of Britain’s superior sea skills and technology, and also because Britain would be fighting a defensive war, allowing it to win with fewer forces. Napoleon never lost substantial impediment to his control of Europe. As his force neared that goal, Napoleon grew increasingly impatient and began planning an immediate attack.

托福写作模板:学生参与决策

托福写作模板及范文参考：

At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus, such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some universities, experts are hired to make this decisions, students almost never involved. Which approach do you prefer and why.

托福写作范文参考：

We can never over emphasize the importance of campus life during which people mature intellectually and psychologically. It is a university’s unshakable responsibility to provide qualified education and various facilities. For a university to function well, there must be effective and reasonable rules regulating behaviors of both students and staffs. In my mind, it is students, but not experts, who should be responsible for the making of rules.

Admittedly, inviting professional and experienced experts to make rules is an easy solution for universities to effectively manage students and staffs. Given years of work experience, experts not only understand students’ needs and preferences, but also know well how to help students regulate behaviors, such as cultivating good habits, managing time and having healthy diets. For example, to encourage students to have enough time to sleep, experts usually require libraries to close at 10 o’clock; also, to help students keep healthy, they demand dining halls to provide nutritious food, such as organic vegetables and fruits.

However, it is actually difficult for experts to truly think from students’ perspective, so some of their rules may be not appropriate. On the contrary, students, though inexperienced, deserve the right to make rules for themselves and the opportunity to improve their abilities to manage. To begin with, it is students who study and live on campus that can enact rules flexible and reasonable enough to help students improve efficiency in both study and social activities. However, experts, as observers of students, may be unavoidably theoretical. For instance, during exam weeks, it is inconvenient to close libraries at 10 o’clock, as many students need more time and a quiet place to finish their assignments and prepare for exams, which is usually ignored by experts.

Secondly, it is also universities’ duty to help students learn self-management and leadership by giving them the right to enact rules for all students on campus. Undoubtedly, student government ought to take the responsibility to collect students’ opinions from polls, negotiate with students having different requirements, and finally introduce rules that can be respected and observed by all. Since these are rules made by students themselves, there is no reason to complain and violate. Moreover, this is a rare opportunity for members of student government to enhance leadership and management capability. Though the process will be surely time consuming and even arouse various problems, it is worthy given the huge benefits to students.

To sum up, endowing students the right to make rules for themselves is a better option for universities to accommodate students’ needs and help them grow up.