雅思考试要考多长时间呢

托福听力中跟不上语速的问题在考生中其实颇为普遍，特别是一些本身听力基础一般且没有做过专门训练的同学，今天小编给大家带来了托福听力跟不上语速常见原因和应对方法介绍，希望能够帮助到大家，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

托福听力跟不上语速常见原因和应对方法介绍

托福听力跟不上语速原因分析：单个单词的辨音速度

有些同学单个单词的发音都没有问题，单词拼写也都ok，拼写完词义也能准确讲出来，但能够做到以上全部，那你听到一个词音可以跳过拼写，直接反应出词义吗?

如果你可以直接、准确反应词义，那你的反应时间是多少呢?如果你听到一个单词需要10秒的时间才能反应出词义，那么显然托福的听力的语速就对你来说太快了。所以，单个单词的反应速度，是你突破语速的第一步。

托福听力跟不上语速原因分析：基础短语的熟练程度

你能快速反应出sense和grant的意思了，那你能熟练快速在音频中消化make sense或者take sth. for granted这样的基础短语吗?

有些同学逐个单词听辨音都没问题，可总是合在一起在文本中就无法消化，基础短语是制约你突破语速的第二个关键点。大家在背诵托福词汇的时候一定要留意后面所附上的固定搭配和例句。

托福听力跟不上语速原因分析：主体语法结构的快速理解

词汇辨音和短语都掌握的棒棒的，需要快速突破语速，快速理解意群结构的第三个关键点，就是要在一遍放音状况下，快速把握句子的主体语法结构(主-谓-宾)。

而在高语速练习中，快速抓到句子主干，日常最有效的练习方式便是逐句的跟读和听译练习。“一句，一停，一跟读”这样做不仅矫正了每一个单词的发音，而且还可以再跟读练习中，突破连读，略读等语音现象以及练习整句的语音语调，听译练习可以让你快速抓取句子结构，对于整句话做一个大意理解，并练习你的快速理解能力。

当然任何方法，都需要持之以恒的练习，在日积月累中才能看到效果，各位备考的同学一定要记住备考过程中要耐得住寂寞，脚踏实地，终有一天将收获质的进步。

2020托福听力练习：晚年开始健康饮食习惯

Let's say your diet has been not so great.

Maybe too much red meat, especially processed meat.

Maybe too many sugary soft drinks.

And maybe you've been eating like that for decades.

So what's the point of trying to make some healthful changes now, after the damage has presumably been done?

“It is impressive that changes even very late in life,such as even being older and having a heart attack, a dietary change can within a matter of a few months drop our risk greatly of a recurrent heart attack or death.”

Walter Willett. He chairs the Department of Nutrition at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.

He spoke at a January 15th forum on Cancer and Diet that wound up touching on diet and health in general.

“So it's never too late to make important changes.

For diabetes also, if we change our diet almost immediately our risk of diabetes goes down.

But that's not to say you just should just wait till you're old to start living a healthy life.

We're seeing in some studies now that what women ate as adolescents, especially if they ate a lot more red meat, that affected breast cancer risk later in their life.

So it's definitely important if you want the healthiest overall life is to start a healthy lifestyle early.

But if you've sort of ignored things it's never too late to still get some benefit.”

The entire hour-long forum featuring Willett and other researchers discussing diet and health is archived on line.

Just google “Harvard public health forum”.

Let's say your diet has been not so great. 我们假设你的饮食习惯不是特别好的状况。

Maybe too much red meat, especially processed meat. 也许摄取太多的红肉，尤其是那些加工过的肉类。

Maybe too many sugary soft drinks. 也许还有很多含糖软饮料。

And maybe you've been eating like that for decades. 可能几十年来你一直都是这样的饮食习惯。

So what's the point of trying to make some healthful changes now, after the damage has presumably been done? 因此既然无形中已经养成这样的坏习惯对身体造成伤害，那现在尝试健康饮食的改变意义在哪里呢?

It is impressive that changes even very late in life, such as even being older and having a heart attack, 这样的改变在进入晚年后会产生重大的影响，比如随着岁月流逝身体负担越来越重并且有心脏病困扰，

a dietary change can within a matter of a few months drop our risk greatly of a recurrent heart attack or death. 改善饮食可以在数个月内大大降低心脏病复发或死亡的风险。

Walter Willett. He chairs the Department of Nutrition at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health. 哈佛大学公共卫生学院营养系主任沃尔特·维莱特说道。

He spoke at a January 15th forum on Cancer and Diet that wound up touching on diet and health in general. 在1月15日关注饮食与健康的癌症与饮食 论坛上他这样说道。

So it's never too late to make important changes.For diabetes also, if we change our diet almost immediately our risk of diabetes goes down. 因此亡羊补牢永远不晚。对于糖尿病而言也是如此，如果改变自己的饮食习惯，我们罹患糖尿病的风险会即刻降低。

But that's not to say you just should just wait till you're old to start living a healthy life. 但这并不表明你要等待老年后才要开始健康生活。

We're seeing in some studies now that what women ate as adolescents, especially if they ate a lot more red meat, that affected breast cancer risk later in their life. 通过一些研究，我们了解到一些女性在年轻时食用大量红肉，到了晚年就会增加患乳腺癌的风险。

So it's definitely important if you want the healthiest overall life is to start a healthy lifestyle early. 因此如果你想要健康，尽早开始健康的生活方式是绝对重要的。

But if you've sort of ignored things it's never too late to still get some benefit. 但如果你经常忽视，现在开始也不晚!

The entire hour-long forum featuring Willett and other researchers discussing diet and health is archived on line. 如想浏览维莱特和其他研究人员就饮食与健康方面的完整讨论内容，

Just google Harvard public health forum. 请在搜索引擎当中搜索关键字哈佛公共健康论坛即可。

2020托福听力练习：奥巴马谈枪支暴力问题

“After Connecticut passed a law requiring background checks and gun safety course, gun deaths decreased by 40 percent.

Forty percent.”

President Obama today.

In his announcement that he was taking executive action to require more gun sellers to be licensed and to do background checks on gun buyers, he also touched upon the problems facing public health researchers who try to study gun violence and deaths.

“Meanwhile, since Missouri repealed a law requiring comprehensive background checks and purchase permits, gun deaths have increased to an almost 50 percent higher than the national average.

One study found unsurprisingly that criminals in Missouri now have easier access to guns.

“And the evidence tells us that in states that require background checks law-abiding Americans don't find it any harder to purchase guns whatsoever.

Their guns have not been confiscated, their rights have not been infringed.

“And that's just the information we have access to.

With more research we could further improve gun safety, just as with more research we've reduced traffic fatalities enormously over the last 30 years.

“We do research when cars, food, medicine, even toys, harm people so that we make them safer.

And you know what, research, science, those are good things, they work. They do.

“But think about this.

When it comes to an inherently deadly weapon—nobody argues that guns are potentially deadly weapons that kill tens of thousands of Americans every year,

Congress actually voted to make it harder for public health experts to conduct research into gun violence, made it harder to collect data and facts, and develop strategies to reduce gun violence.”

After Connecticut passed a law requiring background checks and gun safety course, gun deaths decreased by 40 percent. 在康涅狄格州通过法律要求审查枪支背景及进行枪支安全课程后，死亡人数下降了40%。

Forty percent. 下降40%。

President Obama today. 这是美国总统奥巴马在今日中所提到的。

In his announcement that he was taking executive action to require more gun sellers to be licensed and to do background checks on gun buyers, 在这次演讲中，奥巴马总统表示要采取行政措施要求枪支销售人员获得销售许可，同时对购买者进行背景审查，

he also touched upon the problems facing public health researchers who try to study gun violence and deaths. 总统还谈到研究枪支暴力及相关死亡事件的公共卫生研究人员所面临的困境。

Meanwhile, since Missouri repealed a law requiring comprehensive background checks and purchase permits, gun deaths have increased to an almost 50 percent higher than the national average. 然而，自从密苏里实施全面背景调查及要求购买许可的法律后，这个州的死亡人数同全国平均水平相比高出近50%。

One study found unsurprisingly that criminals in Missouri now have easier access to guns. 一项研究显示密苏里州的犯罪分子能够轻易获得枪支。

And the evidence tells us that in states that require background checks law-abiding Americans don't find it any harder to purchase guns whatsoever. 而且有证据显示尽管有些州要求对枪支购买者进行背景调查，但守法的美国公民并不认为购买枪支是一件难事。

Their guns have not been confiscated, their rights have not been infringed. 因为他们的枪支没有被没收，权利也没有受到侵害。

And that's just the information we have access to. 这就是我们所掌握到的信息。

With more research we could further improve gun safety, just as with more research we've reduced traffic fatalities enormously over the last 30 years. 随着越来越多的相关研究，我们能够提高枪支的安全性，就像过去30年进行大量交通事故调查后将其减少一样。

We do research when cars, food, medicine, even toys, harm people so that we make them safer. 我们对汽车、食品、药物、甚至玩具进行调查研究，降低它们的伤害，增加安全性。

And you know what, research, science, those are good things, they work. They do. 而且你知道，研究、科学，这些有效的方法会起到作用。

But think about this. 但考虑下这个问题。

When it comes to an inherently deadly weapon—nobody argues that guns are potentially deadly weapons that kill tens of thousands of Americans every year, 但涉及到致命性武器时—没有人认为枪支是每年造成成千上万美国人死亡的潜在致命性武器。

Congress actually voted to make it harder for public health experts to conduct research into gun violence, made it harder to collect data and facts, and develop strategies to reduce gun violence. 实际上国会对此进行的投票增加了公共安全专家对枪支暴力事件调查研究的难度，使得收集数据及事实难上加难，而且制定降低枪支暴力政策的难度也大为增加。