GRE写作：从哪里开始写

GRE写作开头结尾有哪些技巧呢??今天小编给大家带来GRE写作开头结尾的具体技巧，希望能够帮助到大家，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE写作：开头结尾的具体技巧

新GRE作文Argue写作开头结尾：

新GRE作文Argue和issue不一样，开头结尾都有迹可循，这个也许是唯一能搞出模板的东西。考试的时候我都是一边写开头一边想错误。等开头写完了，错误也找全了。开头一般说，这文章标明，因为(照抄原文)，所以(原文)，作者于是得出结论(原文)。但是，作者论证的时候犯了一些错误(可以随便列举一个，比如证据不足)，如果能够注意以下几点，那么这篇文章能够更有说服力。

写到这儿都不用动脑子的。

结尾呢，也跟新GRE作文issue不一样。我们不一定要力求升华，毕竟不是立论文。就大概总结说，因为作者犯了错误一错误二和错误三，所以文章没有吸引力。如果作者能做到改进一，改进二和改进三，那么这篇文章就会更好了。(错误和改进都是之前写过的。所以无脑照抄，或者适当变脸，写上去就行了，字数也是大大的有。)

新GRE作文Argue写作挑错：

挑错怎么挑呢?反正我感觉，除了事实说明，比如有个城市叫A市，旁边有个B市这样的句子，基本每个句子都有错。这个我因为辩论的原因，难以传授什么秘诀。大家可能看几道题找找感觉就好了。本着质疑的态度，每句话都怀疑一下就可以了。再不行就幻想自己在网上和人对喷。对喷的时候，对方说的每句话你都恨不得直接拍桌子反对。有这样的气势就可以了。注意，每当出现样本调查，一定要抓住猛骂。质疑样本，质疑容量，质疑可信度，什么都能质疑。另外，每当出现类比和因果关系，也要质疑。这个只能大家随机应变了。要说逻辑培养也不是一天两天，GRE作文考的逻辑也很直白，一般找三个不是问题，实在不行看几篇范文就明白了。

新GRE作文Argue写作文段：

中间三段怎么放?我感觉，第二段一定要说个最大的问题。这个不一定要是全文最大的问题，而是各位感觉最大的。绝大多数情况下，最明显那个错，也是各位觉得最大的错，也就是全文最大的错。不是也没关系。因为各位感觉最大的错，各位有话说，那么第二段一定会很丰满，也基本不会出错，字数也拉上来了，妥了一半。

有人说这三段也能写出递进或者并列，我感觉写递进有点困难，因为错都差不多，还要花心思论证哪个错的多哪个错的少。我的习惯，大家可能借鉴一下。先写一个最大的错，然后再抓一个我觉得能论证好几句的错。剩下来的基本都是一两句可以提一提的错，比如证据不足啊，其他可能情况啊，那就都并到第三段，开头就说，除了上述两点，还有一些细节问题可以注意。然后随便抓两三个说一说，凑成一段。

最后结尾也说，作者有错误一，错误二，以及上文提到的细节(problematic details mentioned above)，如果能有改进一改进二点点点，就点点点了。

具体每段论证，我的习惯是先说错误，然后说为什么错，最后说如何改进。这就成了逻辑严密的一段。

GRE写作满分范文赏析

The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Silver Screen Movie Production Company.  

"According to a recent report from our marketing department, fewer people attended movies produced by Silver Screen during the past year than in any other year.  And yet the percentage of generally favorable comments by movie reviewers about specific Silver Screen movies actually increased during this period.  Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers; so the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available.  Silver Screen should therefore spend more of its budget next year on reaching the public through advertising and less on producing new movies."  

Americans are spending millions of their hard earned dollars to see the latest theatrical productions, and we here at Silver Screen want to exploit our share of that profit.  Surveys have proven that our movies are better than ever, but yet our attendance is lower than ever.  This finding screams one shortcoming:  advertisement.  

Try to think of the last movie you remember.  The movie which probably leaps into everyone's mind is Independence Day.  Why?  Certainly not because of the actual film, but because of all the 'hype' which the movie received.  Furthermore, this grand production paid off big for the production company.  

Does anyone that you know drive by the theatre just to see what is playing and then pick a film based on the catchiness of the title?  No.  Viewers buy tickets for movies which they have seen effectively advertised on television and radio.  

Not only must Silver Screen advertise more, but we must advertise when it really counts: Monday Night Football, the evening news, awards shows, etc.  

Everyone has heard the saying, "you must spend money to make money", and it is proven true in this industry.  

From a completely economical standpoint, the ad is actually more important than the film itself.  Consumers are compelled by the preview and buy a ticket.  I am not suggesting that we compromise the integrity of our films, but I cannot overstate the importance of this decision.

Therefore, I submit that the Silver Screen Production Company attempt to secure 30% of the fiscal budget for advertisement.  It will be the best money you have ever spent.  

Commentary  

The writer of this seriously flawed response has adopted the position that she or he works for Silver Screen and that it is her or his job to present in expanded form the fallacious reasoning of the argument.  In so doing, the writer turns the argument task into an issue-like discussion.  The writer presents no analysis of the argument.  

The paper is characterized by a series of undeveloped paragraphs, yet there is some variety in syntax and there is adequate control of both language and the elements of writing.  However, even though the writing may be typical of a 4 score level, the absence of any kind of critique requires a score of 2.

GRE写作满分范文赏析

The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Silver Screen Movie Production Company.  

"According to a recent report from our marketing department, fewer people attended movies produced by Silver Screen during the past year than in any other year.  And yet the percentage of generally favorable comments by movie reviewers about specific Silver Screen movies actually increased during this period.  Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers; so the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available.  Silver Screen should therefore spend more of its budget next year on reaching the public through advertising and less on producing new movies."  

This argument states the problem but the conclusion is not compatible to the rest of the statement.  

Silver Screen recognized that fewer people attended movies in the studied year.  I would recommend that they find out if this was happening with the entire movie market.  It might of have been a poor year for movies for all movie companies.  

Silver Screen recognized that of the movies that they did, they received favorable reviews.  It should be concluded that they are doing well with the movies that they are making.  Obviously, they are on track with the consumer in what they are producing.  

I understand the conclusion that more people need to be exposed to the movies available for viewing.  The last statement focuses on the fact that advertising needs to be increased, but does it by cutting production costs.  This is wrong, instead of continuing what is working the company plans on focusing on advertising while taking away from producing.  The consumers like the movies they make.  If Silver Screen focuses their funds with advertising, producing funds will suffer.  It will not matter how much advertising is done, if it is a poorly produced movie, nobody will want to go?  Eventually, Silver Screen will get the reputation of producing bad movies.  There has to be some compromise which doesn't hurt producing costs.  

Commentary  

This response is flawed.  It makes two points, the first of which is undeveloped (paragraph 2) and the second of which (the remainder of the essay) is mainly discussion rather than analysis, although some meager analysis is present.  The author also offers a questionable assumption of his or her own in stating in paragraph 4 that "the consumers like the movies they make."  Overall, there is nothing incisive or convincing in this paper.  It is loosely organized and not well developed.  

The response is clear; what errors there are never interfere with a reader's understanding, but there are frequent minor errors in language, syntax, and punctuation.  

For all of these reasons, the response is clearly limited and deserves a score of 3.