雅思写作：语法扣分最为致命

gre写作考试一直是很多学子的心头大事，如何做好gre写作备考?下面小编就和大家分享gre写作考试备考资料简介，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

gre写作考试备考资料简介

gre写作备考

1. 对于时间充裕的同学

gre写作资料中的高频是出现频率高的作文,没有人能保证考时一定遇到高频题. 如果还有不少时间,建议不要放弃任何一道题, 很多经验证明了，很多考生都有可能遇到有史以来第一次考到的ISSUE和ARGU题, 所以什么事情都是有可能发生的(就好象指出ARGU里的逻辑错误一样)

2. 对于时间不那么充裕的同学

如何利用gre写作考试准备ISSUE。建议准备出现频率最高的40道ISSUE,注意这里指的频率指的是近两年的总频率,不分时间地域,同时加上本月本地出现3次以上的ISSUE题(大部分已经包括在前40道里,因此需要另外准备的不多).

拿我个人来说,我在北京考,考前准备了总频超过30次的38道ISSUE(3.8备考资料的数据,现在可能有更新)+5至6道北京3月出现3次以上同时未包括在这38道中的题,考试时遇到的两道 177,141分别出现39,38次,均为高频。

就我考前从各种渠道了解的信息，绝大部分人考时遇到一道频数大于30的可能性是相当大的。(也许有人会说很多人并没有来报备考资料，我的数据不一定可靠。这个就见仁见智了，我只是表达个人的建议，采纳与否，全是个人的自由.但无疑当考前时间不够时,准备出现机率较大的题目显然是特殊情况下的最佳选择了)

如何利用gre作文备考资料准备ARGU。重要的是多熟悉题目,时间充裕的应该做到任何一道题都没有不认识的单词,不理解的语句,这样找错才能有的放矢.

时间不够的,至少把考过10次以上的题目(约90多道) 加上本月本地出现过但未列入上述90多道的题目全过一遍,弄懂每一个单词.这很重要,否则考场上碰到关键单词不认识,加上紧张,可就傻眼了.拿我来说,考时遇到的是10几频的题,幸好考前晚上刚过了一遍,否则文中有两个单词都不认识,显然会很不爽.

GRE写作满分范文赏析

The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Silver Screen Movie Production Company.  

"According to a recent report from our marketing department, fewer people attended movies produced by Silver Screen during the past year than in any other year.  And yet the percentage of generally favorable comments by movie reviewers about specific Silver Screen movies actually increased during this period.  Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers; so the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available.  Silver Screen should therefore spend more of its budget next year on reaching the public through advertising and less on producing new movies."  

The advertising director of Silver Screen should lose his job.  It is clear that his analysis of the decrease in attendance in the past year was incomplete.  A better qualified individual might have explored the issue further by doing several different things.  First of all, surveys of the general population could provide a clue to the decreased viewership. They may find that people aren't as willing to pay the high prices anymore.  A survey may also reveal that people are aware of Silver Screen, but opt not to see the films.  An inspection of the nature of the films made by Silver Screen could also hint to the root of the problem.  If Silver Screen produces a lot of the same type of movie, then the problem may be that they don't produce enough to appeal to the diverse interests of the population.  For instance,  if their movies typically contain excessive violence and foul language, parents won't take their children to these films.  That is a significant portion of the potential viewing population lost.  

The ad director mentions that reviewers liked specific films and gave more  favorable reviews than in the past.  But he neglects to mention the specific numbers- critics may have raved about 2 movies and turned their thumbs down the 10 others.  If thats' the case, it's no wonder that viewership has declined.  

Spending more on advertising, and less on production, as the ad director suggests, could drive the company out of business.  If the media builds alot of hype over a new release that was poorly produced, people are more likely to be disappointed, and skeptical about future productions.  This is certainly not in the company's best interests. What is in the company's best interest is a broader scope of the problem, and different approaches to solving i  

Commentary  

This strong response begins with an attack on the advertising director of Silver Screen but quickly shifts to identifying major flaws in the argument.  The main points of the critique are that  

-- the real reasons for a decline in viewership have not yet been    identified; 

-- Silver Screen may not produce different kinds of movies to appeal to    diverse interests; 

-- the number of favorably reviewed movies may actually have been    very low; and 

-- spending money to produce a possibly poor movie could hurt rather than help the company.  

Although more points are made here than are made in the sample 6 response on this topic, each of the points made in the 6 paper is developed.  That is not the case here.  In this response, each point is supported (by perhaps an additional sentence), but it is not further developed.  The paper is smoothly organized with few but appropriate transitions.  The writing is strong with some variety in syntax.  For these reasons, this response earns a score of 5.

GRE写作满分范文赏析

The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Silver Screen Movie Production Company.  

"According to a recent report from our marketing department, fewer people attended movies produced by Silver Screen during the past year than in any other year.  And yet the percentage of generally favorable comments by movie reviewers about specific Silver Screen movies actually increased during this period.  Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers; so the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available.  Silver Screen should therefore spend more of its budget next year on reaching the public through advertising and less on producing new movies."  

Although the reasoning in this arguement is logical, the writer failed to consider other reasons for the disparity between the percentage of people attending the company's movie and the percentage of favorable reviews.  Perhaps the fault lies with the reviewers and not the production company; the public may not trust the critics' reviews.  Another posibility for the attendance drop is that the general public does not find the subject matter of the movies enticing.  If that were the case, spending less on producing new movies in an effort to re-direct funds to advertising could backfire by further limiting the types of movies available to the potential audience.  Maybe the general public is simply not impressed with the critically-acclaimed qualities of the movies (such as eloquent screenplays, artful cinematography, and realistic acting) and and would prefer seeing flashy special effects and big-name stars.  The possible reasons for the attendance decline are numerous; even aspects not directly related to the movie industry (such as the improving quality of television programming and the increasing popularity of home computer use) may play large roles.  The company's management would be wise to consider and study the entire realm of possibilities before making drastic changes in its budget based on one statistical discovery.  

Commentary  

This response identifies and analyzes some important flaws in the argument.  Although the number of points mentioned is the same as that in the sample 5 paper, this response remains at the 4 score level because the points of the critique are only minimally developed or supported.  

The essay identifies four points:  

-- the public might not trust critics 

-- the movies' subject matter might not be appealing

-- the public might prefer seeing special effects or big-name stars rather    than good cinematography or realistic acting 

-- perhaps improvement in TV programming or increased use of home    computers has kept people away from movie theaters  

Ideas in the response are conveyed well and clearly; the use of language is generally strong.  But the paper's "bare-bones" analysis gives it a list-like quality.  It is therefore merely adequate and merits a score of 4.