gre写作考试如何结尾最优秀

gre写作考试的分数并不是那么容易拿到，同学们一定要知道gre写作考试首段如何写，还要确立正确的gre写作考试观点，下面小编就和大家分享gre写作考试首段该怎么写好，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

gre写作考试首段该怎么写好?

1、gre写作首段方式-观点对立

观点对立的方式就是指文章开头首先引出人们对要讨论的问题的不同看法，然后提出作者自己的gre写作考试观点，或者偏向的哪个看法。对立法的句型多用于有争议性的主题。比如：当问起世界上现在最大的问题是什么，许多人说是严重的能源危机。他们担心人类不久会用完石油、发生食品短缺。但有些人则持乐观的看法，他们把能源危机看成是经济发展的自然结果，而且只有随着经济和技术的进一步发展才能得以解决。使用观点对立的开头方式，是对写作题目一个很好的阐释，虽然题目的内容都会有人支持，但是，考生却能够明确提出自己支持的观点，说明考生一定有充分的理由去论证自己的观点。

2、gre写作首段方式-背景引入

在新gre写作考试的很多话题之中，可能会涉及到一些社会问题或者是教育问题。在遇到类似的问题的时候，考生可以首先选择站在大背景下来阐述这个话题，从而能够用大背景来支持自己的后面的观点，使得观点一开始就比较有说服力。例如：父母如果没有时间陪孩子，可以将孩子送到儿童保育中心或者是个人护理中心。一看这个题目就是一个社会类或者是家庭教育的问题，针对这个题目，考生可以首先讲解一下现代社会压力大，尤其是做了父母的人，身上的责任会更大，所以就会更加努力地工作或者寻找挣钱养家的途径，因此陪伴孩子的机会少。从而引出如何安顿孩子的方法，提出自己的观点。利用背景引入的方式，还能够保证考生不偏离主题，能够确保话题展开的准确性。

3、gre写作首段方式-提出问题

gre作文开头运用提问的方式，可以让你的开头段与众不同的gre写作方法。提问法是以问题为导向，引起读者兴趣，引导你的读者跟随你的思路走进你的思维世界。利用提问的方式，还能够引发读者的思考，从而让读者能够对这个问题产生共鸣。此外，提问的表达方式有时还能够起到强调的作用，利用反问的方式，能够帮助考生强调自己的观点。例如：There has been undesirable trend in recent years towards the worship of money. A recent survey showed that X percent of respondents ranked getting rich as their top priority，compared to X percent only a few years ago. Why do people fail to realize that wealth does not necessarily bring happiness?从这个开头段中可以看出，首先也是题目要讨论的话题，但是最后一句用一个“反问”的方式，提出要讨论的话题，还起到了强调的作用，能够引起读者共鸣，引发思考。

GRE写作高分范文：生动剖析写作

GRE写作题目：

Too much time, money, and energy are spent developing new and more elaborate technology. Society should instead focus on maximizing the use of existing technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens.

GRE写作范文：

I must say that I reject this statement. While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, that does not in any way mean that we should stop progressing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it. Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so. To do so would be tantamount to adopting a fatalistic approach; I think most people would reject that.

Technology has helped, and it has hurt. Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.

Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?

What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.

Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hosptal, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existing technology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have made those discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.

GRE写作分析：

字数：651

语言：平实的语句完全没有网络流行模板的痕迹，也是许多过了6级的考生通过练习可以达到的水平。

I must say that I reject this statement.

Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so.

Technology has helped, and it has hurt.

Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.

GRE写作高分范文：避免偏激

题目：

Most people often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.

人们总是在寻找相同点，即使是在非常不同的事物间也不例外，甚至有时候这样做是无用乃至有害的。实际上，我们应该具体问题具体分析;我们应该尽量避免比较的倾向。

正文：

In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.

Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance, one may not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, how it is produced or what its function is.What’s more, looking for

similarities not only refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.

Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it is transparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs the function as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.