GRE作文备考重点注意

你想知道如何改进新的GRE写作吗?关于GRE写作有很多秘密你还不知道，gre写作技巧,gre考试培训就像你想知道如何提高你的GRE写作经验一样。今天小编就和大家分享gre写作提分内容分享,希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

gre写作提分内容分享

GRE写作经验：研究模式

所谓范文，是众多GRE考试专家学者总结出的重要指导材料。这都是为试题写的一篇高分的样本文章。因此，考生要做的不仅是背诵范文，还要逐字分析范文，分析文章的逻辑顺序、选词、修辞，这些都是难得的财富。

GRE写作技巧：准备模板

每个GRE候选人都需要有自己的写作模板。在考场里，许多学生可能因为紧张而大脑短路。一些他们经常练习的词汇或逻辑会突然消失，在他们的脑海中留下一片空白。这就要求考生在平时总结不同的模板，增加更多的记忆。即使是在考场紧张的时候，大脑也会有条件地反映一些有组织的句子，为他的作文增光添彩。

GRE写作小贴士：修改文章

许多考生甚至在备考和练习作文时也经常写作。但事实上，作文一旦出版，就不能上架。需要多修改、多检查、多补缺，gre写作技巧,gre考试培训随时查找自己文章的不足之处。只有反复修改，才能提高我们的写作和创作水平。

GRE写作经验：勤于思考

有思想的生活是充实的，gre作文也是。我们看别人的优秀作品，首先要学习，其次要比较，看为什么别人的观点比自己的更合适，这样才能提高自己对问题的看法。三个人一定要有我的老师，不断学习，多思考，丰富自己的大脑，为自己的创作提供素材。

GRE写作经验：熟悉题库

GRE作文的一大亮点是作文题库的完全开放。因此，如果考生能够对题库中的每一篇文章进行逻辑分析，记住每一个问题的逻辑分析，gre写作技巧,gre考试培训就可以节省你大量的考试时间，更合理地安排你的作文创作，而无需在考试过程中再次分析问题的逻辑，浪费不必要的时间。

GRE写作：善于学习

备考GRE不能闭门造车，集思广益，通过各种方式和更多的考试朋友和老师交流来更快提高。有时，你的意见和讨论可能会突然间通过你对一件事的意见。大多数时候，你的讨论对你来说只是很多不同的角度。多学点东西对你有好处。

GRE写作高分范文：北美GRE写作满分范文

The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:

"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

GRE首段

This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.

GRE中间段1

The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.

GRE中间段2

This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.

GRE中间段3

Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.

GRE末端

In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。， coal mine)。 Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.

GRE这篇官方钦定满分的范文，其最明显的优点在于：

1. 字数高达599words, GRE充分体现了字数为王的判分倾向。

2. 标准的五段制，首段、GRE末端，中间三段，看上去很美。

3. 没有陈词滥调、GRE满篇废话的模板式语言。

只有以上三点离满分还是很远的，GRE之所以SIX，我看更重要的在于，每段各尽其责，既独立又统一，形成了完整的ARGUMENT，specifically:

1. 首段再现了原TOPIC的推理过程，GRE并指出其assumptions多有不适;尤其令阅卷人高兴的是：首段在最后简化罗列了推理中的三个问题。要知道美国人就喜欢的作文---总分式，在首段就把三个ideas罗列出来，然后在中间三段分别展开，先总后分，一目了然。

2. 中一的TS -- “The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment.”可谓是一针见血，一剑封喉。对于这样严重的推理漏洞，如果不首先指出，其argument必然软弱乏力。此所谓Topic中的 “必削点”，不可不察。

3. 中二的TS – “This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment.”这可谓是剑走偏锋，独辟蹊径，出人所料。文章竟然批评了Topic以钱为本经营理念，提出了要以人为本，这样写是有一定风险，毕竟这不是Issue。那本文是如何化险为夷的呢?且看本段最后一句“this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.”我不由得长舒一口，人家再次回归了，又回到了Topic中以“Money”为本的推理。

4. 中三的TS – “Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer.”这充分体现了作者不只是坐而论道的arguer，而是关心其可行性的现实主义者，考虑到方案本身的可行性和局限性。

5. 末端不但对首段提出的论点做出了重复性的总结，GRE而且又不厌其烦地把中间三段的ideas一一罗列。如此“啰嗦”估计令某些同学略有不齿，但这恰恰是美国人的最爱，cultural shock了吧?

本文最令我欣赏的地方，GRE就是对EXAMPLES的运用

1. 中间段一，运用了“设例”GRE(假设的情况)，$100 million啦、$5,000了，很幼稚是吧?可美国人喜欢啊;咱中国的学生，尤其是理工科的，喜欢用一些相当高深的例子，有没有想过那些阅卷老师能看懂吗?尤其是在极短时间内，他们IQ又不高，知识又不多，联想又不丰富……

2. 中间段二，运用了“具例”GRE(具体的例子)，举一个妇孺皆知的Toyota例子把想说明的问题统统道出，再次体现出美国人喜欢浅显易懂的事例。

3. 中间段三，运用了“泛例”GRE(某一类人、团体或组织)，通过采煤行业指出了计划可行性的所受到的制约，一个多么质朴无华的泛例，充分地考虑到了阅卷老师的理解能力。

以上这一切怎能不让美国阅卷者频频颔首，GRE啧啧称善呢?他或她手中的笔在纸上划出了一条美丽的弧线 —— 6

相反，有些中国学生，凭借自己繁密的逻辑、GRE渊深的例子和云雾缭绕的行文，每每令那些阅卷者咬唇咂舌，shrug连连，又怎能获得一个理想的分数呢?你挑战了他的智商，他必然报复你的分数。

GRE写作四法助你考试

拆分法

分析题目极为有效的一种手段，其基本原理就是面对一个云山雾罩的抽象的大的概念，将其一分为二或者一分为多进行分别讨论。

解析法

通过对题目主体的需求进行分析，从而找到支持论证的有说服力的理由与典型的论据。主体需求，可以是个人，教育，社会，政府与文化发展等方面的需求。

正反法

对题目的主张或者结论分成两面分析。没有绝对对错，哪边理由与例证多我们走哪边。也可写成让步式或者对照式两面论证。

比较法

适用于题干中两个对等概念的比较。

这四种解题办法可以交替结合使用，我们一起来看一下典型的例子：

例子："Students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study.They should question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively."

相信这个题会比较简单。大的概念是Study是否需要质疑，要看学习的内容。

1.如果是Well established principles and theories，就别质疑争议了吧?各专业的同学可以列举出一堆这样的内容。

2.如果是Controversial issues，就质疑争议好了。找你最有话可说的领域争议一番。

最好写的可质疑争议内容包括：Stem cell research，abortion，same sex marriage，nuclear power 等。