GRE写作易错扣分问题

写作训练是考生备考GRE考试的重点环节之一，而作文其实也是GRE分数中比较重要的一个部分。很多同学备考作文时不知道怎样能写出优美的句子。下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作没思路没灵感如何应对，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE写作没思路没灵感如何应对?这2个实用技巧值得一试

写作灵感来自足够的训练积累

众所周知，一个GRE考试句子的核心是结构，而突破就要从这一点开始。有人持异议，比如说“阅读不是做语法分析”，也有一定道理。诚然，固守结构而为之所囿是不可取的，但是对于刚刚开始练习写长句的人而言，必不可少。尤其像国内的考试，作文根本不涉及这些部分，而到了 GRE AW 的时候落差相当大，就更有必要练习。如果有深厚的阅读积淀，可能会发现这一点不成问题，很快可以适应过来，如果没有而又想走捷径，就要动动脑子了。

一个句子，核心部分就是主谓宾了。值得注意的是在写句子的时候，“不平行原则”一定要牢牢记住。所谓的不平行，就是中文和英文，在表达相同的意思的时候，句子数目不平行，各自的主谓宾不平行(不是绝对的，但经常为了表达效果要进行顺序的调整)，用词点不平行，等等诸多不平行。所以每一次我看到别人的文章中有明显的翻译的痕迹时，就一定会指出“不要直译，要找对应的意思”，就是这个道理。“表面上的相同”不应该写成“ostensibly same”，虽然它们的中文释义恰好就是这两个词。这样一来一去就相差甚远了。

提前构思来启发灵感

动笔之前，有必要想一想自己要表达的意群，进行合理的组织，GRE分数重要的是按照英文的语序来操作。这个过程也可以在写的过程中进行，只是不要养成习惯就好。我开始写的时候，一个句子有时候要写上好几分钟，多数时间都在考虑用词准确，或者调整顺序，增加修饰，最后把一串意思完成在这个句子里。举个例子吧。比如说，教育是一个涉及群体合作的过程。当然，这个骨架不存在调整主谓宾的问题(as so far)，直接构建就行了。然后，这个education有没有什么限定?群体?合作需不需要具体的形容或者分类?这个过程要不要指明时间，空间等等因素?注意这不是思维的发散，而是把你构思好的，相关的一串东西集中起来(因为等你写的时候构思早就构完了)。

这样发散一下，散开的是句子，集中的是意思，也就是相关的意群都集中起来了，文章就不会显得很散(重要!长句的很主要的好处之一)。经常看到，就像开始的时候说的，有些人总是用小于10个词的短句，感觉应该是一盘散沙而不是一串珍珠，GRE写作满分要注意这些。

那么怎么才能找到这样写句子的感觉呢?一点一点改进，各人可以找到自己的方法。比如说，刚刚开始的时候不要着急上主语，主语后边也不要着急立刻上谓语，适当使用转折，插入，修饰，等等，自己总结一下这些tip.这种句子构造的练习，着眼于骨架，落实在具体的词汇。但是最终目的不是机械的构造句子，因为人不是机器，作文也不是什么机械的东西，只要找到了感觉，一出手写出一个基本上成型的句子，就OK了。

GRE写作高分范文：多媒体教育

GRE写作范文：

Nowadays there is a growing concern about the role that innovations have played in the field of learning. While most people think that innovations benefit learning process in various ways，different opinions arise that these technology advancements actually distract students from real learning. On balance，according to my personal observation，whether innovations can be beneficial or detrimental to real learning depends on the students and the teachers，not on these innovations themselves.

To begin with，technological innovations do help teaching and learning in various ways.With the aid of these technologies，the process of teaching and learning can be shorter and easier than before. For instance，if a student want certain published papers of an academic discipline，he/she may look through considerable catalogs to find the ones he/she needs. However，with the help of Internet innovation，at present most of these papers are published online. Consequently，to find certain paper the procedure is much easier and shorter， the students just type the key words and other information of the paper，and then the system will search the database，and the papers are there waiting for them. As this new approach can save a lot of time for the students，he/she could have more time reading the papers and absorbing the knowledge rather than checking and looking for the papers that could be a waste of his/her time. This example aptly illustrates how technology advancement benefited the students and their learning process.

Secondly，while innovations can help learning in various ways，it is more important that the central role of the pursuit for knowledge and wisdoms are maintained. What real matters is not the approach but the purpose of learning. In India，where modern technologies are less applied to the learning process than in the US and other developed countries，still a lot of distinguished students achieved their academic goal with their hard work and desires to knowledge. In the US，where the software engineering students are given the most advanced facilities and apparatus for their learning and research，however，it is wildly accepted that they are far less outstanding compared to the Indian students of software，who may share computers in groups. From this comparison we can see that the real and core push of learning is the desire for knowledge，not the help of innovations.

In addition，if not guided properly，the technology advancement might inhibit learning.In other words，innovation can distract the students from real learning than helping them. It is obvious that a computer can help students of science to calculate mathematical equations but can also be used for recreation such as net surfing or computer games. It is highly possible that these students can spend more time and energy on recreations rather than learning when using a computer. Thus，learning is inhibited. Under this circumstance，guidance and restrictions are needed to ensure the right use of innovations for learning，or the consequence may be on the contrary to the students and teachers' desire.

GRE写作高分范文：竞争利弊问题

题目：

"Competition is ultimately more beneficial than detrimental to society."

归根结底，竞争对于社会是利多弊少。

正文：

Darwin suggested that the process of evolution is one based on competition. This deadly competition weeds out the weak and only the fittest of the species survives. Humans, being the product of millions of years of evolution, are by nature, competitive beings. Yet, humans are also social beings. Like the bees in the hive, we are not very successful living completely on our own. We need to cooperate with other individuals for our survival. Thus, a conflict ensues, between our innate competitiveness, and our need to cooperate. There are pros and cons associated with both. However, it is my belief that overall, competition, is more detrimental than beneficial to human society.

First, let us try to identify why there is competition in the first place. In an environment abundant with resources, where supply outstrips demand, there is very little need for the inhabitants to fight with each other over them. This is not the case on planet earth. Resources are limited, and there is constant jostling to get to the front of the queue to get acquire them. For example, thousands of prospective students apply to gain entrance to top universities around the world, but there are only a handful of places in those

universities. Thus, there is competition to get into to these hallowed institutions of higher learning.From a utilitarian perspective, competition is a good thing. In evolution it is responsible for the elimination of "weak" genes. In the business environment, it gets rid of the weaker players. In politics, it weeds out unpopular candidates. In academia, it gets rid of weak students.

Furthermore, competition leads to self improvement. Businesses will strive to offer better products and services at lesser prices. The consumer reaps rich rewards from this competitive spirit. Politicians strive to do the utmost for the people, so they would get reelected. Students excel in there studies, trying to outdo each other.

Thus, ostensibly, competition is responsible for the betterment of the society as a whole. However, this is just the superficial view. Underneath the surface, competition, in every aspect, is slowly eating away at the very fabric of the society.

While it is true to say that competition in corporate world has brought great benefits to the consumer, the society as "Missed A here"whole is playing a great price for it. Most businesses are exploiting cheap labour in the third world to maximise their profits. There are thousands of sweatshops run by well known western corporations in countries like Indonesia, Bangladesh and China. People are forced to work in squalid conditions, often 16 hours a day. They are lucky to receive a dollar a day for there labours. The moment a government in any of these countries try to improve the working conditions of the employees, these multinational giants flee the country, often leaving whole communities facing financial ruin. The corporations are aware that there are plenty of other labour markets that could be exploited with gay abandon.

That is just the human cost. What about the environmental costs? Competition has forced many corporations to "stream line" their operations. Environmental standards are normally the first victims of this "stream line" process. A significant amount of environmental pollution and land degradation has been blamed on industry, yet the factories keep producing more and more. Thousands of items go unsold each year due to competition. Only a fraction of this merchandise is recycled. The rest goes to the already overflowing landfills.