GRE写作备考学习技能实现提分

在GRE作文考试中，字数多的作文相对字数少的作文分数要高一些，但是有许多同学就是写不出那么多字来，如何解决这个问题呢?下面小编就和大家分享GRE作文提升字数技巧，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE作文提升字数技巧

很多考生对新GRE作文字数要求不是很清楚，虽然，新GRE作文考试并没有明确规定具体的字数，但是没有规定也尽量不要太少。怎么才能把GRE写作字数写多一些呢?这就要在平时多积累写作素材，有话可说就写的多，无话可说当然写的就少了，你想要写出500-600字的GRE作文，不仅要打字快，还要英文单词熟练，更重要的是知道自己要写什么。

写好GRE作文开头点题实例经验分析

虽然引题可以照抄，这样考生就能一边写一边想。但是要挑战权威的论题，很多人表示，挑战权威能够推动社会发展。这句话很有道理，因为有很多的例子告诉我们，在挑战权威之后，社会里出现的问题才能改变，这样才能解决问题，从而得到发展。

是因为权威也是由人构成的，是人就难免会犯错，所以没有人挑战权威的话，就没有人纠错，那社会就停滞不前。

这时候已经定下了态度是有保留支持，就是AAB，而且我也想到了民权运动，还有想起了巴菲特。但是B还没来得及想。那么接下来表态就写：对于这一观点，我是赞同的，因为社会的发展，无论是宏观的社会变革，还是一个学科变革引起的社会效益，都有很多是被挑战权威的人带起的。由于权威往往是权利掌握者，比如政府和法律，反抗需要付出一定代价爱，所以不是很多人有勇气和魄力去反抗。正因为如此，才显得他们的可贵，也才识得社会发展变得不容易。

GRE写作满分范文

"It is unfortunate that today's educators place so much emphasis on finding out what students want to include in the curriculum and then giving it to them.  It is the educators' duty to determine the curriculum and the students' duty to study what is presented to them." 

There are many school violences in each school.  Those are big problems to our govenment and social.  School violences effect the studying of students.  This is very serious, even some students are nervious to go school.  In fact, the government must give students a clean place to study.  Teachers should help students know it is a duty to study.  So, everyone should face those big problems. 

Do we know what are students' ideas?  Do the educators try to know?  Most educators hope the govenment can give students more and help them more.  These are people's hope.  But it is so unfortunate that students can't have a good place to study.  Also, teachers have to teach the students.  Not that students can know what to study by themself.  In the compus, there are many guys sell the drugs and acohol to younger students.  Why those guys can go into the school?  That is also the main problem. 

When we were little, we didn't know what is correct and what is wrong.  So we lose ourself easily.  At the same time, we need much care from parents and teachers.  So our teachers and parents play the important roles and they own must do better.  Because some students learn some bad habits from their teachers and parents.   

If we want to resolve all the problems, we must face the problems and find out the reasons, then try to resolve them.  We also must care all students.  If we can help them, tring to do our best.  Then, the problems will become less and less.                        

COMMENTARY 

This is a seriously flawed response to the topic.  The writer begins by discussing school violence and the need for a good place to study, parental and teacher influence, and resolution of school problems.  The issue of who should determine the curriculum, teachers or students, is implied but not addressed directly.  In fact, teacher-directed learning seems to be a small point in a series of concerns related to school violence.  The development of a position on the issue is unfocused and disorganized.  Even the example, drug selling, relates to school violence and not to curricular responsibility. 

Language errors are numerous.  Problems with correct use of tense, diction, word order, sentence structure, and subject-verb agreement also interfere with meaning.  Had the writer not included references to teachers helping students know what to study, the essay would probably have received a score of 1 instead of a 2.

GRE写作满分范文

"In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists — people who can provide broad perspectives."  

The need for generalists is undeniable but one can not underestimate the need and importance of specialists. The medical profession is a good example of an area that requires both generalists and specialists. If there were no generalists in the profession there would be no one to help patients determine when a specialist was needed. There are certain problems that a general practitioner can take care of and there are other problems that are out of his or her league. The general practitioner is the an appropriate place to start when a patient develops a problem. Many times the general practitioner is more than capable of handling problems that arise and other times he or she is unable to fully take control of the patient's care. It isn't a fault with the general practitioners. There is just too much to know for any one person to be an expert on all topics. It takes people years to become experts on a single topic, never mind being an expert on everything in the medical profession.  

I am currently working in a large teaching hospital where the need for both general practitioners and specialists is obvious. When a patient is admitted to a general medicine floor, the general medicine physicians are not always able to deal with every problem the patient has without some help from the specialists. It would be unrealistic, not to mention unfair to the general practitioners, to expect the general practitioners to know everything about everything. The key is to know where everyone's knowledge and area of expertise lie and use their strengths to optimize patient care.  

On the general medicine team in which I worked, the team would constantly be requesting consults from specialists. Whether it be a renal, psychiatric, orthopedic, rehabilitation, speech, gastroenterologist, or any other specialist, their input was constantly needed and used to get the patient well as quickly as possible. The list of specialists can go on longer than one would think and it is just impossible for one person to know everything about each one of them.  

Although the need for generalists is apparent, it would be hard to survive without specialists, also. When a person acts as a generalist, they know little bit about everything, but certainly not a totally inclusive knowledge of everything. The specialist is there to help add the expertise and inclusive knowledge that the generalist may be lacking. The most important thing to remember with specialists and generalists is to recognize both's strengths and weaknesses and capitalize on the strengths to achieve whatever goal may be desired.  

COMMENTARY 

Overall, this is a competent response to the topic. The writer disputes the claim that "specialists are over-rated" and argues from the position that both specialists and generalists are needed. The single extended example clearly supports the premise of the argument as the writer compares the roles and responsibilities of generalists and specialists in the medical profession. By paragraph 3, however, the discussion falters, and the concluding paragraph does little more than repeat ideas presented in the first two paragraphs.  

This essay displays generally adequate control over syntax and usage, and the word choice, while appropriate, lacks precision.