GRE写作如何恰当运用长难句

很多考生都想要在GRE考试中获得写作高分，那就需要在备考GRE过程中学习一些高分范文中比较常见的写法套路。下面小编就和大家分享GRE高分作文各段落模板，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE高分作文各段落模板

GRE高分作文开头段模板分析

In the argument, the …(主题对象) recommends that …(对结论做论述，基本上可以抄原文，用另外一种方式表达即可)。To support this recommendation the argument point out that …(说明文章用了什么论据去证明观点了，同上抄袭即可) however …This argument is logically flawed in several critical respects (说明这篇文章逻辑上是有缺陷的)。

GRE写作常见攻击套路模板举例

1. 调查结果没有证据申明

To begin with, the argument depends on the assumption that… (阐述说出了一个没有根据的申明，并说出文中的原因) —rather than for some other reasons. Yet it is entirely possible that… (说明这种猜测可能的原因) or some other factor. Without ruling out all other reasons why… (重述这个申明)…(说出反方向的结论)。

2. 提到了样本，但是数据不具有代表性(数据不够)

Firstly, the author provides no evidence that the survey is statistically reliable. Perhaps the survey’s sample is not sufficient in size or representative of the quality of …(说明对象的数量和质量不够) For that matter, this survey is not strong enough to establish causation between… (在这里列出原因和结果，做比较) However, the other reasons of the survey which (叙述其他原因下的情况)。 As a result, without the evidence that the survey is statistically reliable the author cannot justifiably draw any conclusion by relying on this survey。

3. 猜测，但是没有证据

Thirdly, the argument assumes that… (阐述文中的猜测) However, the letter provides no evidence to substantiate this assumption. In fact, the letter suggests that this might be the case. By admitting that …， the letter implies that …说明影响他们happy的因素还有其他的方面，不光是研究中所列举。

GRE写作ARGUMENT如何反驳观点论据

1. 时间上的错误类比

To begin with…(陈述某个数据) may not a reliable date of that rate would be now(和现在相比较是不可信的)。 Perhaps the… (反例)， For that matter, perhaps …(说出反例的情况下会导致何种结果)。 In short, without ruling out other possible reasons for …(假设说出针对反例应该怎么做)the memo’s author cannot convince me on the basis of …(说出应该有的结论)。

2.错误的因果关系

3. 两个事实错误的类比

Even if…(让步，即使某个条件成立) the argument unfairly assumes that…(说明错误的类比的情况)。 It is entirely possible that the …(比较对象) own different situations. Perhaps …(具体说出反例) Without accounting for such differences between the two places is unreliable。

4. 错误的推论

Even if …(让步，即使某个条件成立)the argument relied on the future assumption that …(说出要让步的是事实)。 Yet the only evidence the argument offer to substantiate this assumption (说出文中的根据)。 Perhaps …(说出有可能出现的其他情况导致这个事实)if so, (说出不一样的结果，与上面事实相矛盾)。 Or…(其他的情况) In short, without more information about…(对上面的可能情况总结) were established it is impossible to assess …(回到上面的结论)

GRE写作结论模板分析

说明结论不完美，可以有其他的方法

Finally, the argument fails to consider …(有更好的办法实现目标)。 Perhaps by…(办法一)， or by (办法二)， (对目标进行展望) In short, without weighing the suggestion against alternatives, it is unconvincing that (说明提供的方案不好)

赢利

Finally, even if the families support to build the new seafood restaurant, the restaurant would not necessarily be profitable as a result. Profitability is a function of both revenue and expense. Thus, it is quite possible that the restaurant’s costs of obtaining high-quality and healthy seafood or of new promoting restaurant might render it unprofitable despite its popularity. Without weighing revenue against expenses the argument’s conclusion is premature at best。

同时叙述两个错误的论据

The memo also makes two hasty assumptions about …(说明两个猜想相关的内容)。 One such assumption is that …(第一个猜想的情况说明)。 It is entirely possible that …(反例)。 Another assumption is that(另外一个错误的猜想) Common sense informs me that (反例)

Furthermore, the difference in the two firms’ overall placement time last year does not necessarily indicate that Delany would be the better choice to serve XYZ’s laid-off employees. These employees might have particular skills or needs that are not representative of the two firm’s clients in general. Besides, one year’s placement statistics hardly sufficient to draw any firm conclusions。

GRE高分作文结尾段模板分享

In sum, the argument seems logical, but is based on nothing more than pure speculation and perhaps wishful thinking, yet lack of some warranted investigation. To strength it, the author needs to evaluate all possible alternatives and provide detail and comprehensive evidence before jumping to the conclusion that …(文中的结论)。

GRE写作满分范文

"In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists — people who can provide broad perspectives."  

In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both positive and negative effects among persons in Western society call for a balance in which there are both specialists and generalists.  

Specialists are necessary in order to allow society as a whole to properly and usefully assimilate the masses of new information and knowledge that have come out of research and have been widely 

disseminated through mass global media. As the head of Pharmacology at my university once said (and I paraphrase): "I can only research what I do because there are so many who have come before me to whom I can turn for basic knowledge. It is only because of each of the narrowly focussed individuals at each step that a full and true understanding of the complexities of life can be had. Each person can only hold enough knowledge to add one small rung to the ladder, but together we can climb to the moon." This illustrates the point that our societies level of knowledge and technology is at a stage in which there simply must be specialists in order for our society to take advantage of the information available to us. 

Simply put, without specialists, our society would find itself bogged down in the Sargasso sea of information overload. While it was fine for early physicists to learn and understand the few laws and ideas that existed during their times, now, no one individual can possibly digest and assimilate all of the knowledge in any given area.  

On the other hand, Over specialization means narrow focii in which people can lose the larger picture. No one can hope to understand the human body by only inspecting one's own toe-nails. What we learn from a narrow focus may be internally logically coherent but may be irrelevant or fallacious within the framework of a broader perspective. Further, if we inspect only our toe-nails, we may conclude that the whole body is hard and white. Useful conclusions and thus perhaps useful inventions must come by sharing among specialists. Simply throwing out various discoveries means we have a pile of useless discoveries, it is only when one can make with them a mosaic that we can see that they may form a picture.  

Not only may over-specialization be dangerous in terms of the truth, purity and cohesion of knowledge, but it can also serve to drown moral or universal issues. Generalists and only generalists can see a broad enough picture to realize and introduce to the world the problems of the environment. With 

specialization, each person focusses on their research and their goals. Thus, industrialization, expansion, and new technologies are driven ahead. Meanwhile no individual can see the wholisitc view of our 

global existence in which true advancement may mean stifling individual specialists for the greater good of all.  

Finally, over-specialization in a people's daily lives and jobs has meant personal and psychological compartmentalization. People are forced into pigeon holes early in life (at least by university) and must consciously attempt to consume external forms of stimuli and information in order not to be lost in their small and isolated universe. Not only does this make for narrowly focussed and generally 

poorly-educated individuals, but it guarantees a sense of loss of community, often followed by a feeling of psychological displacement and personal dissatisfaction.  

Without generalists, society becomes inward-looking and eventually inefficient. Without a society that recognizes the importance of broad-mindedness and fora a for sharing generalities, individuals become isolated. Thus, while our form of society necessitates specialists, generalists are equally important. 

Specialists drive us forward in a series of thrusts while generalists make sure we are still on the jousting field and know what the stakes are.

COMMENTARY 

This outstanding response displays insightful analysis, meticulous development, impressive vocabulary and a mastery of the elements of effective writing. The writer disagrees with the stated opinions by arguing that specialists and generalists are both vital: specialists prevent us from becoming "bogged down in the Sargasso sea of information overload," while generalists provide help to see "the big picture" and, unlike specialists, protect our "greater good."  

The essay is carefully constructed throughout, enabling the reader to move effortlessly from point to point as the writer examines the multi-faceted implications of the issue and provides compelling reasons and examples to support the premise and take the argument to an effective conclusion. Although other "6" responses may not be as eloquent as this essay, they nevertheless all display the test taker's ability to articulate complex ideas effectively and precisely. 

GRE写作满分范文

Six months ago the region of Forestville increased the speed limit for vehicles traveling on the region's highways by ten miles per hour.  Since that change took effect, the number of automobile accidents in that region has increased by 15 percent.  But the speed limit in Elmsford, a region neighboring Forestville, remained unchanged, and automobile accidents declined slightly during the same six-month period.  Therefore, if the citizens of Forestville want to reduce the number of automobile accidents on the region's highways, they should campaign to reduce Forestville's speed limit to what it was before the increase.  

The argument gives statistics of increases in automobile accidents since the speed limit increased six months ago on the highways of Forestville.  The argument also gives a statement of how the neighboring region of Forestville, did not increase or decrease the speed limit.  It remained unchanged and automobile accidents declined slightly during the same six-month period.  The argument may appeal to those who have been effected by the increase in accidents, but it does not give an emotional appeal overall.  We are relying on the authors statistics but we don't know where they came from and if they are reliable. The argument needs more examples and illustrations to get his point across to more people.  It is suggested that the citizens of Forestville campaign to reduce Forestville's speed limit to what it was before the increase, but it is usually hard to start a campaign. One person needs to take action.  If the author is a citizen of Forestville, maybe he should take the initiative. Comments: 

This seriously flawed critique presents only one idea relevant to an analysis of the argument: "The argument needs more examples and illustrations to get his point across to more people."  Everything else in the essay is either summarizing the argument, speculating, or offering advice.  The result is a response that is clearly on topic but that provides no analysis of the line of reasoning in the argument.  

In addition to the lack of analysis, the writing is weak.  The organization is loose, although not illogical, and intended meaning is sometimes unclear (e.g., "but it does not give an emotional appeal overall.").  For these reasons, the response deserves a score of 2 according to the scoring guide.