中考百天奋斗励志格言语录大全

GRE考生都想在写作中取得高分，但想取得高分并非易事。很多必要的写作知识你掌握了吗?GRE词汇你背上80%了吗?写作技巧有没有了解?下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作各类备考训练提分方法经验总结，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE写作各类备考训练提分方法经验总结

关于GRE作文官方题库

题库是给定的，经过几年下来的前人总结，本身已经毫无悬念。高频，模板，例证，范文，大量资料充斥在互联网上并且被专业人士和机构总结印刷成册。考生们只销在考前花两三个月集中练习，得个申请的分数根本不成问题。基础好的人更是一两个月已足矣。但问题也随之而来了，大家都用着同样的参考资料不说，写作水平也都如出一辙，考官看来也就无法分辨孰好孰坏，唯有给出最安全的分数。

关于GRE作文的语言应用

很多同学对备考更倾向于去临阵磨枪，语言上虽然慢慢向规范的英文书面语靠拢，但仍缺乏时间上的沉淀而无法达到GRE写作本身的语言精练，一步到位的特点。仅仅做到了形似而神不似。因此观点写得稍好一点的同学，就可得到那0.5，如果有语言做支持，就可上到4。

关于GRE作文的思路拓展

可以说大部分考生的GRE写作还停留在临摹而不是独立作品的阶段。因为有着现成的模板和例证，在范文的引导下，模仿写作的结构和观点。所以往往造成一篇作文看起来是那么回事儿，但实际上又没有说透的感觉。对题目的意义和作文目的的把握还缺少透彻的理解。

GRE作文提升几个要点解读

1. 词汇。很多人在问，究竟需要不需要在写作前背完词汇精选的单词。小编认为词汇精选的单词是针对语文部分搜集整理的，与作文的关系不大。作文需要的高级词汇仍然是那几个，therefore,however,admittedly。机器或者考官一见，马上会锁定，懂得写议论文，就靠它们几个。另外一些常用动词名词等实词的同义词要多背几组，英语的修辞不在华丽，在变换。句型要多变，表达同种意思的词当然也要变换。

2. 模板。模板怎么用，不是不用，而是要合理利用。因为这实在是一个可以让初学者一目了然，直奔主题的好东西。什么是结构，模板就是结构。模板是骨架，是支撑，但不是灵魂。灵魂的部分当然是文章的主旨，要靠自己在不懈的写作，不断的钻研中去摸索和寻找的。千万不可以依赖模板。一篇没有灵魂的骨架子是没法得高分的。

3. 练习。练习是一定要坚持得，从始至终。而且量变到质变的突破是需要时间的。

4. 临考。临考前的模考是为了让大家去把握时间，更好的进一步的查缺补漏。在考场上，更是要临危不乱，无论出现什么样的题目，相信自己，都是见过的，万变不离其宗，这当然需要练习时不断去完善自己的知识库。

GRE写作满分范文赏析

"The media (books, film, music, television, for example) tend to create rather than reflect the values of a society."

"The media tend to create rather than reflect the values of a society", is true because society allow the media to pusrue this in such a way.

The American culture as a whole lives through the pulse of the media world and is enthralled by movies, lyrics and film. Because of the nature by which our society is dependant on the media, the media is able to create any senses of values adaptable by our society.

This is not to say that the media is solely responsible for the values of American culture, however, our society makes this creation possible. Although there are many who will disagree with the medias portrayal of many issues, our society as a whole fuels the fire to which the media thrives on. For the most part, books, films and music are produced to sell and the media knows to which audience they are targetting.

The way in which a culture enable the media to create it's values, ultimately reflects the values of a society.

Comments:

This is a seriously flawed response to the topic because the reasoning is weak and the ideas are unclear.

The writer's position on the issue seems clear enough, but the paper presents few reasons to support that position. And even those reasons are not explained clearly. For example, the writer often refers to the means by which the media influence society (e.g., "such a way," "the nature by which," and "the way in which") but fails to explain what those ideas mean or why they are important.

Problems in word choice frequently create confusion. For example, these could be interesting ideas if they were expressed clearly: "our society as a whole fuels the fire to which the media thrives on" and "the media is able to create any senses of values adaptable by our society."

Also, many basic errors affect meaning throughout the paper: subject-verb agreement (first and last paragraphs), comma splice (third paragraph), "medias'" for "media's" (third paragraph), and "it's" for "its" (last paragraph).

The lack of clear reasons, combined with serious error in language use, keep this essay at the 2 score level.

GRE写作满分范文赏析

The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Silver Screen Movie Production Company.  

"According to a recent report from our marketing department, fewer people attended movies produced by Silver Screen during the past year than in any other year.  And yet the percentage of generally favorable comments by movie reviewers about specific Silver Screen movies actually increased during this period.  Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers; so the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available.  Silver Screen should therefore spend more of its budget next year on reaching the public through advertising and less on producing new movies."  

Although the reasoning in this arguement is logical, the writer failed to consider other reasons for the disparity between the percentage of people attending the company's movie and the percentage of favorable reviews.  Perhaps the fault lies with the reviewers and not the production company; the public may not trust the critics' reviews.  Another posibility for the attendance drop is that the general public does not find the subject matter of the movies enticing.  If that were the case, spending less on producing new movies in an effort to re-direct funds to advertising could backfire by further limiting the types of movies available to the potential audience.  Maybe the general public is simply not impressed with the critically-acclaimed qualities of the movies (such as eloquent screenplays, artful cinematography, and realistic acting) and and would prefer seeing flashy special effects and big-name stars.  The possible reasons for the attendance decline are numerous; even aspects not directly related to the movie industry (such as the improving quality of television programming and the increasing popularity of home computer use) may play large roles.  The company's management would be wise to consider and study the entire realm of possibilities before making drastic changes in its budget based on one statistical discovery.  

Commentary  

This response identifies and analyzes some important flaws in the argument.  Although the number of points mentioned is the same as that in the sample 5 paper, this response remains at the 4 score level because the points of the critique are only minimally developed or supported.  

The essay identifies four points:  

-- the public might not trust critics 

-- the movies' subject matter might not be appealing

-- the public might prefer seeing special effects or big-name stars rather    than good cinematography or realistic acting 

-- perhaps improvement in TV programming or increased use of home    computers has kept people away from movie theaters  

Ideas in the response are conveyed well and clearly; the use of language is generally strong.  But the paper's "bare-bones" analysis gives it a list-like quality.  It is therefore merely adequate and merits a score of 4.