公司员工提前离职申请书

托福写作备考的过程中不仅需要提升自己的写作实力，还要了解备考的要点。今天小编和大家分享托福写作备考要点你要了解,希望能帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

不会备考托福写作?这几个写作备考要点你要了解

托福写作备考要点一 题型

托福写作包括两道试题，一是独立写作试题，其二是综合写作试题，这两个部分要求大概用50分钟的时间内完成。

有关独立写作试题部分：要求30分钟的时间把这一部分写作完成，要求考生按照自己的知识与经验陈述、解释并支持对某一问题的看法。通常有效的回答应是一篇超过300个单词的作文。考生能够根据自己来选择材料、形式和观点等，不会受到题目的严格限制。这个试题是分到了主观性题目。

有关综合写作试题部分：考生要求阅读一篇学术文章，给出的阅读时间一般是3分钟左右。然后文章隐去，此时考生要求听一段大概1分半钟的演讲。但考生写作文时能够看见放听力材料时隐去的阅读材料。考生在阅读和听录音的过程中可以做笔记来帮助答题。考生有20分钟的时间来总结和归纳听力材料中的要点，还要解释一些要点和阅读材料中的要点有何关系。作文内容是根据考试所提出的问题而定的，不能由考生自由发挥。需要考生根据自己的经验和知识陈述、解释并支持对待某一问题的某个看法。通常有效的回答应是一篇300个单词左右的作文。

托福写作备考要点二 语法

不少同学的写作因为语法问题太多而让人“无法直视”，几乎每个句子里都有语法错误的文章如何指望得到一个满意的分数呢?所以，备考中要“狠抓”自己写作中的语法问题。

首先，语法概念比较薄弱的同学要找本靠谱的语法书好好看一遍，如果你时间有限，就重点研究“主从复合句”部分的内容，毕竟写复合句是托福写作的一大要求。其次，平时多写句子和段落，写完后可以找英语好的同学或你的老师来批改，就他们指出的语法问题去修正句子和段落，然后在本子上总结下这次所犯语法问题的情况，比如：主谓不一致、从句独立成句等，到下次写作之前拿出记录来再看一眼，反复提醒自己。练习、批改、修正、总结、再练习永远是改善写作语法问题最佳的实践路径。

托福写作备考要点三 构思

官方指南在写作部分中明确提到“但要知道，仅仅使用第一，第二这样的连接词并不能保证作文结构的严谨，还要注意让所有的观点与文章的主题相关，紧扣中心思想。换句话说，作文要有统一性，评分原则中提到的统一性，渐进性和连贯性这些都是评估作文结构是否严谨，读者能否比较容易地跟上作者思路的标准。”

通过上段叙述，我们不难发现作文论证统一性的重要性。而事实上这也正是被许多考生所忽略的问题。在拿到试题后，考生们不是先腾出时间构思结构框架，而是急着抓住哪怕是一分钟的时间动笔写作，其实如此的选择是要不得的，建议各位考生在考试时不要舍不得这准备的时间，正所谓“磨刀不误砍柴功”，因为只有当你事先构思好而不是边想边写，你才能真正做到论证内容的一致性，观点与论据的统一性，也才能真正取得高分。

托福写作通常是一个五段三点式的写作。用最直白的作答应对题目的提问，用单边的手段安排整篇文章成5段的总分总思路是十分适用的，开头段+中间三段+结尾段。托福写作考查的就是考生是否会熟练运用这样的结构去表达自己对一个观点的看法。

托福写作备考要点四 思维

西方人的思路是演绎式的(deduction)，他们会先把自己最主要的观点亮出来，然后再针对自己的观点做进一步的阐释;而中国人的思路是归纳式的(induction)，中国人擅于先大段的说理论证，分析各种可能的情况，然后最后加上一个总结。在托福写作中我们一定要使用演绎式的写作方式，切忌使用归纳式的方式。原因在于：使用演绎式的写作方式，一开始就亮出观点，使读者很清晰地明白作者的观点，使得读者更容易觉得文章的思路清晰，逻辑严密;而使用归纳式的写作方式，在阅读之前论证时，读者自己会先于作者得出一个观点，而当最后作者的观点与读者的观点相异时，就会很容易的使读者认为作者的思路不清晰，逻辑不严密。这亦是中国式思路归纳式的缺点。

托福写作模板：小孩成长环境

It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay.

托福写作模板参考一：

With the development of the transportation system and some residence institution， the world is getting smaller and smaller， and people are not restricted in only one area. In addition to the convenient condition， because there are different places with different cultures， living standards， education environment and other disparity， they are inclined to transfer from one place to the other. Is it better to move around than stay in one place? I believe there are no uniform answers，but in my opinion， I do agree with the claim that to move around is better than to stay in one place.

Most people's growth comes with the transfers in their life. As for me， when I was young I lived in a small county. Because the school in there was not suitable to me， I transferred from my little county to a city to get a better education. As soon as I got to the city， I was amazed that the world here was so different here as my hometown .If I still lived in my hometown， it was impossible for me to make the wildest guess at what the real world looked like. The first transfer has made me to imagine my own life and spur on me to go further. With the confidence， I went into a university which I would never think of it before. The university is located in a different city so that I have to come into another world. Compared with my living city， the one is more complicated in which there are different people， more convenient transportation， more competitive environment. I love all of this very much. Communicating with different students and teachers， I have learned much from them which will benefit me throughout my life and my lifestyle. Now I am in a graduate school also so beautiful that I will never regret my selection of leaving my hometown because the transfer has given me a splendid life.

Also， like we students， there are many adults transferring their work place in order to grasp better opportunities. No matter in industry， in agriculture or in service， workers have rights to choose their work companies which leads them to work from place to place and then they accumulate precious experience and skills to get priorities to others.

People not only transfer in their own country， but also go abroad to get education， work or live through the rest of their life in appropriate countries. We can see that many students including me want to go to the foreign countries to study further and forge ourselves， and that many parents send their little sons or daughters to foreign countries to study. After all， diverse circumstances give persons new experience and broaden their narrow sight， even help them get more comprehensive understanding of the world， the society and our life itself.

However， some people may say that if people move around， they will pay for much such as money， time and energy. It is right to say that it takes one person some time to get used to his or her new environment， new personal relationship which indeed influences the growth of children， the efficiency of our work and the stability of our society and family. And I have to admit that people should make considerate plans before changing their places and may not transfer aimlessly and frequently. But I think sometimes it is just all the friction that has made the world wealthier and more beautiful. Therefore， I still think it is better to travel around than to live in one place.

托福写作模板参考二：

There are advantages and disadvantages to a childhood in either the country or a city. It's hard to say which is better. Growing up in the country means a certain amount of isolation. You're in a small town or on a farm and not with a lot of people. Even more important， the people you meet every day tend to be just like you. Most will be the same race as you， have the same background as you， and will have gone to the same schools as you. In the city， the people you meet are all different. There are different races and different cultures. You get a more interesting mix.

City people tend to come from a lot of different places and move around a lot. So， there isn't the sense of community in the city that you have in the country. People in the city can live in the same apartment building for twenty years and never get to know their neighbors. In the country， everybody knows everybody. For a child， this means the country is more secure. A child can get lost or hurt in the city and have no one to turn to. In the country， everyone's a neighbor. People in the country feel connected to each other.

A child growing up in the city has the advantage of a lot of interesting and exciting places to visit. He or she can go to the zoo， museums， art galleries and concerts. There are a lot of restaurants with different kinds of food. It's easy to see every new movie that comes out. Children in the country don't have a lot of these activities nearby.

All in all， I think a childhood in the city is better because it prepares you more for what real life is like.

托福写作模板：不是所有知识都在书中

It has been said, "Not everything that is learned is contained in books." Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?

托福写作模板范文参考：

Books are considered to be the source of all knowledge, but all that one learns through a book is only of theoretical nature in the form of ideas and concepts. It is essential to utilize them in a real environment and experience the knowledge that is learned from books.

Learning is nothing but understanding the world around us. Books, no doubt are a great source of knowledge as it gives us an idea about a particular subject in detail. But all that one could learn from it is limited to the level of knowing how a certain phenomenon occurs, or how a certain concept works. The knowledge gained through books alone cannot help anyone, because what one learns through the books should be put in to use to harvest the benefits. For instance, a person who wants to learn driving can go through various manuals and guides that teach people how to drive, but all this knowledge is useful only when you are actually driving the car on the roads. It would be an utter waste of time if one just reads the books and does not use them for practical purpose.

Learning through experience is always a lot different from learning through books. Let us consider the same example of a person wanting to learn to drive: even if he goes through every book that is available on driving, still it cannot qualify him as an expert driver. This is because of the fact that books about driving can only teach people traffic rules and provide solutions on how to handle certain situations. The situations faced by a driver could be totally different from what he had learnt from a book. Sometimes we find that the real environment is quite different from the one perceived by us through reading books. This is the very reason why, even in educational institutions, all theoretical classes are followed by practical sessions.

Learning through experience can also be more effective than learning through books because one does not envision everything on his own, but is given a chance to experience the reality. The art of driving can be enjoyed only when we are behind the wheels and not when reading it in books. Moreover, any book is actually an account of past experiences, i.e.it is based on the experiences of people who tried to develop a new idea. The books are their experiences, telling us what they already have tried. Thus from their experiences we can correct ourselves and thus save valuable time and resources. It helps us to concentrate on their failures and to correct them, but they alone cannot teach us everything we need to know. The knowledge learned through books alone cannot help us to face all the exigencies that we would face in real life situations; we have to practice on our own.

Books are like a guiding light in one's pursuit for knowledge. But it is left to everyone of us to experience it first hand and learn new things for the betterment of their lives. So the notion experience is the best teacher" is perfectly true.